%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO234+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.78s 2.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 16 unt; 11 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_67) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_63,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_63) ).
cnf(i_0_55,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_55) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_52,plain,
equally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_65,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_69,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4gfv1lkh/input.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_67 ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_63 ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_55 ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ equally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
equally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,X1)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,X1)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk3_0,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk3_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk3_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_92]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]),c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]) ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99]) ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_102]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : GEO234+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:18:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.78/2.45 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.78/2.45 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.78/2.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 7.78/2.45
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof found!
% 7.78/2.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.78/2.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 7.78/2.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 7.78/2.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.78/2.45 # Parsed axioms : 69
% 7.78/2.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Initial clauses : 69
% 7.78/2.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 7.78/2.45 # Processed clauses : 94
% 7.78/2.45 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 7.78/2.45 # ...subsumed : 24
% 7.78/2.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 69
% 7.78/2.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 7.78/2.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Generated clauses : 119
% 7.78/2.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 90
% 7.78/2.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 7.78/2.45 # Paramodulations : 105
% 7.78/2.45 # Factorizations : 14
% 7.78/2.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 67
% 7.78/2.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 7.78/2.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 7.78/2.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 43
% 7.78/2.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62
% 7.78/2.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 159
% 7.78/2.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 7.78/2.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 729
% 7.78/2.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 505
% 7.78/2.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 7.78/2.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 163
% 7.78/2.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 7.78/2.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.78/2.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2294
% 7.78/2.45
% 7.78/2.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.78/2.45 # User time : 0.014 s
% 7.78/2.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.78/2.45 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 7.78/2.45 # ...preprocessing : 0.015 s
% 7.78/2.45 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 7.78/2.45 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.78/2.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------