↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:21:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.69s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : GEO239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May  9 07:43:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.69  % Version:  1.5
% 0.48/0.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.48/0.69  fof(oag10,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~(left_apart_point(A,L)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax', oag10)).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c67,plain,(![A]:(![L]:(~left_apart_point(A,L)&~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c68,plain,((![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,L)))&(![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c67])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c70,plain,(![X43]:(![X44]:(![X45]:(![X46]:(~left_apart_point(X43,X44)&~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c69,plain,((![X43]:(![X44]:~left_apart_point(X43,X44)))&(![X45]:(![X46]:~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c68])).])).
% 0.48/0.69  cnf(c71,plain,~left_apart_point(X96,X97),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c70])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(con,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:(((~apart_point_and_line(A,L))&left_apart_point(B,L))=>left_convergent_lines(L,line_connecting(A,B)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:(((~apart_point_and_line(A,L))&left_apart_point(B,L))=>left_convergent_lines(L,line_connecting(A,B))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:((~apart_point_and_line(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,L))=>left_convergent_lines(L,line_connecting(A,B))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[L]:((~apart_point_and_line(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,L))&~left_convergent_lines(L,line_connecting(A,B)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:((~apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)&left_apart_point(X3,X4))&~left_convergent_lines(X4,line_connecting(X2,X3)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.48/0.69  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,((~apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)&left_apart_point(skolem0002,skolem0003))&~left_convergent_lines(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).
% 0.48/0.69  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,left_apart_point(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 0.48/0.69  cnf(c163,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c6, c71])).
% 0.48/0.69  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.48/0.69  
% 0.48/0.69  % Initial clauses    : 61
% 0.48/0.69  % Processed clauses  : 7
% 0.48/0.69  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.48/0.69  % Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.48/0.69  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.48/0.69  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.48/0.69  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.48/0.69  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.48/0.69  % User time          : 0.306 s
% 0.48/0.69  % System time        : 0.019 s
% 0.48/0.69  % Total time         : 0.325 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------