↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WlfKxkv0rg true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:34:28 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.59s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (   3   ~;   1   |;   2   &;  25   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(incident_point_and_line_type,type,
    incident_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__1_type,type,
    sk__1: $i ).

thf(sk__2_type,type,
    sk__2: $i ).

thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
    left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(left_convergent_lines_type,type,
    left_convergent_lines: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reverse_line_type,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

thf(line_connecting_type,type,
    line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(con,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
      ( ( ( incident_point_and_line @ A @ L )
        & ( left_apart_point @ B @ L ) )
     => ( left_convergent_lines @ L @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
        ( ( ( incident_point_and_line @ A @ L )
          & ( left_apart_point @ B @ L ) )
       => ( left_convergent_lines @ L @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl68,plain,
    left_apart_point @ sk__1 @ sk__2,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(ax10_basics,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,L: $i] :
      ~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
        | ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl47,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax10_basics]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl130,plain,
    $false,
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl68,zip_derived_cl47]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WlfKxkv0rg true
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 17:28:38 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.38  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.38  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.70  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.70  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.70  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.82  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.59/0.82  % BCE start: 70
% 0.59/0.82  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.59/0.82  % PE start: 70
% 0.59/0.82  logic: neq
% 0.59/0.82  % PE eliminated: 30
% 0.59/0.82  % done 6 iterations in 0.017s
% 0.59/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.59/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.82  
% 0.59/0.82  
% 0.59/0.82  % Terminating...
% 0.62/0.88  % Runner terminated.
% 0.62/0.89  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------