↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.42s 2.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fu_5zrr2/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fu_5zrr2/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    i_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:27:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.21/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.42/2.53  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.42/2.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.42/2.53  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.42/2.53  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 8.42/2.53  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.42/2.53  #
% 8.42/2.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 8.42/2.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.42/2.53  
% 8.42/2.53  # Proof found!
% 8.42/2.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.42/2.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.42/2.53  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.42/2.53  
% 8.42/2.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.42/2.53  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 8.42/2.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 8.42/2.53  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 8.42/2.53  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 8.42/2.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------