%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO242+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.74s 2.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ right_convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gva4ub0/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gva4ub0/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
right_convergent_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_gva4ub0/input.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ right_convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
right_convergent_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
~ right_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]) ).
cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : GEO242+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:01:33 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.13/0.38 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.13/0.38 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.13/0.38 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.74/2.17 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 6.74/2.17 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.74/2.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 6.74/2.17
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof found!
% 6.74/2.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.74/2.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 6.74/2.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.74/2.17 # Parsed axioms : 70
% 6.74/2.17 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Initial clauses : 70
% 6.74/2.17 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Initial clauses in saturation : 70
% 6.74/2.17 # Processed clauses : 35
% 6.74/2.17 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # ...subsumed : 5
% 6.74/2.17 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 6.74/2.17 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Generated clauses : 13
% 6.74/2.17 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 6.74/2.17 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Paramodulations : 12
% 6.74/2.17 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Current number of processed clauses : 29
% 6.74/2.17 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 6.74/2.17 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 6.74/2.17 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 6.74/2.17 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% 6.74/2.17 # ...number of literals in the above : 132
% 6.74/2.17 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 6.74/2.17 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 69
% 6.74/2.17 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 6.74/2.17 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84
% 6.74/2.17 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.74/2.17 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1260
% 6.74/2.17
% 6.74/2.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.74/2.17 # User time : 0.011 s
% 6.74/2.17 # System time : 0.002 s
% 6.74/2.17 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 6.74/2.17 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 6.74/2.17 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 6.74/2.17 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.74/2.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------