↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GEO245+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.48pEbD1W8b true

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:34:29 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 1.43s 2.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  33   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__2_type,type,
    sk__2: $i ).

thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
    left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(line_connecting_type,type,
    line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk__type,type,
    sk_: $i ).

thf(sk__1_type,type,
    sk__1: $i ).

thf(distinct_points_type,type,
    distinct_points: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reverse_line_type,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

thf(con,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
     => ( ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) )
       => ( left_apart_point @ B @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
       => ( ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) )
         => ( left_apart_point @ B @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl59,plain,
    left_apart_point @ sk__2 @ ( line_connecting @ sk_ @ sk__1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(oag10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,L: $i] :
      ~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
        | ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[oag10]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
    $false,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl59,zip_derived_cl39]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/1.08  % Problem  : GEO245+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.13/1.18  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.48pEbD1W8b true
% 0.13/1.61  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/1.61  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/1.61  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/1.61  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/1.61  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/1.61  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/1.61  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/1.61  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 17:32:54 EDT 2025
% 0.13/1.62  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/1.62  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/1.62  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/1.63  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/1.65  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/1.66  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/2.38  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/2.38  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/2.38  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.36/2.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.37/2.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.37/2.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.37/2.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.37/2.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.37/2.84  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.40/2.85  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.43/2.94  % Solved by fo/fo1_av.sh.
% 1.43/2.94  % done 13 iterations in 0.031s
% 1.43/2.94  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.43/2.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.43/2.94  
% 1.43/2.94  
% 1.43/2.94  % Terminating...
% 1.80/3.27  % Runner terminated.
% 1.80/3.30  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------