↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO248+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   7   ~;   7   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   2 sgn  12   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(a2_defns,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( right_apart_point(X,Y)
    <=> left_apart_point(X,reverse_line(Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a2_defns) ).

fof(a6_defns,axiom,
    ! [A,L] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(A,L)
    <=> ( right_apart_point(A,L)
        | left_apart_point(A,L) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a6_defns) ).

fof(ax10_basics,axiom,
    ! [A,L] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))
        | left_apart_point(A,L) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax10_basics) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,L] :
      ( ( incident_point_and_line(B,parallel_lines(L,A))
        & apart_point_and_line(A,L) )
     => apart_point_and_line(B,L) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,L] :
        ( ( incident_point_and_line(B,parallel_lines(L,A))
          & apart_point_and_line(A,L) )
       => apart_point_and_line(B,L) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( right_apart_point(A,B)
    | left_apart_point(A,B)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a6_defns]) ).

fof(nnf_37,plain,
    ? [A,B,L] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(B,L)
      & incident_point_and_line(B,parallel_lines(L,A))
      & apart_point_and_line(A,L) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK2,sK1)
    & incident_point_and_line(sK2,parallel_lines(sK1,sK0))
    & apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(L,sK1)],[nnf_37]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    ( right_apart_point(sK0,sK1)
    | left_apart_point(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_86,plain,
    ( left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B))
    | ~ right_apart_point(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a2_defns]) ).

cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    ( left_apart_point(sK0,sK1)
    | left_apart_point(sK0,reverse_line(sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_78]) ).

cnf(c_118,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(A,B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax10_basics]) ).

cnf(c_136,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_135,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_136]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO248+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:10:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 3556189 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.09/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 13:10:16 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.37  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.13/0.37  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 7.000.
% 0.13/0.37  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------