%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : GEO249+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n009.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:45 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 7.68s 1.79s % Output : Proof 9.88s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO249+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0. % 0.06/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:39:20 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.62/0.68 ________ _____ % 0.62/0.68 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.62/0.68 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.62/0.68 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.62/0.68 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.62/0.68 % 0.62/0.68 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.62/0.68 (2023-06-19) % 0.62/0.68 % 0.62/0.68 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.62/0.68 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.62/0.68 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.62/0.68 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.62/0.68 % 0.62/0.68 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.62/0.68 % 0.75/0.68 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.75/0.70 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.75/0.71 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.75/0.71 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 3.13/1.17 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.17 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.21 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.21 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.21 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.21 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.13/1.21 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 6.34/1.62 Prover 5: Proving ... % 7.13/1.69 Prover 2: Proving ... % 7.13/1.69 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.13/1.70 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.13/1.70 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.68/1.78 Prover 5: proved (1076ms) % 7.68/1.79 % 7.68/1.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 7.68/1.79 % 7.68/1.79 Prover 2: proved (1079ms) % 7.68/1.79 % 7.68/1.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 7.68/1.79 % 7.68/1.79 Prover 6: stopped % 8.19/1.82 Prover 3: stopped % 8.19/1.83 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 8.19/1.83 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 8.19/1.83 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 8.19/1.83 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 8.56/1.87 Prover 1: Found proof (size 5) % 8.56/1.87 Prover 1: proved (1163ms) % 8.56/1.91 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 8.56/1.92 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 8.56/1.92 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.56/1.93 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 8.56/1.94 Prover 7: stopped % 9.19/1.95 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 9.19/1.95 Prover 4: stopped % 9.19/1.98 Prover 10: stopped % 9.44/2.02 Prover 0: Proving ... % 9.44/2.02 Prover 11: stopped % 9.79/2.03 Prover 0: stopped % 9.79/2.04 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 9.79/2.04 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.88/2.05 Prover 8: stopped % 9.88/2.05 % 9.88/2.05 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 9.88/2.05 % 9.88/2.05 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 9.88/2.06 Assumptions after simplification: % 9.88/2.06 --------------------------------- % 9.88/2.06 % 9.88/2.06 (con) % 9.88/2.08 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: % 9.88/2.08 $i] : ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & parallel_through_point(v2, v0) = v4 & % 9.88/2.08 reverse_line(v4) = v5 & reverse_line(v2) = v3 & left_apart_point(v1, v5) = 0 % 9.88/2.08 & left_apart_point(v1, v3) = v6 & left_apart_point(v0, v3) = 0 & $i(v5) & % 9.88/2.08 $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) % 9.88/2.08 % 9.88/2.08 (oag10) % 9.88/2.08 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) | ~ % 9.88/2.08 (left_apart_point(v0, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! % 9.88/2.08 [v1: $i] : ( ~ (left_apart_point(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0)) % 9.88/2.08 % 9.88/2.08 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 9.88/2.08 -------------------------------------------- % 9.88/2.08 apt_def, bet_def, bf_def, con_def, div_def, oag1, oag11, oag2, oag3, oag4, oag5, % 9.88/2.08 oag6, oag7, oag8, oag9, oagco1, oagco10, oagco2, oagco3, oagco4, oagco5, oagco6, % 9.88/2.08 oagco7, oagco8, oagco9, oagsub1, oagsub2, oagsub3, oaguc1, oaguc2 % 9.88/2.08 % 9.88/2.08 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 9.88/2.08 --------------------------------- % 9.88/2.08 % 9.88/2.08 Begin of proof % 9.88/2.09 | % 9.88/2.09 | ALPHA: (oag10) implies: % 9.88/2.09 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) | % 9.88/2.09 | ~ (left_apart_point(v0, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0)) % 9.88/2.09 | % 9.88/2.09 | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_34_0, all_34_1, all_34_2, % 9.88/2.09 | all_34_3, all_34_4, all_34_5, all_34_6 gives: % 9.88/2.09 | (2) ~ (all_34_0 = 0) & parallel_through_point(all_34_4, all_34_6) = % 9.88/2.09 | all_34_2 & reverse_line(all_34_2) = all_34_1 & reverse_line(all_34_4) = % 9.88/2.09 | all_34_3 & left_apart_point(all_34_5, all_34_1) = 0 & % 9.88/2.09 | left_apart_point(all_34_5, all_34_3) = all_34_0 & % 9.88/2.09 | left_apart_point(all_34_6, all_34_3) = 0 & $i(all_34_1) & $i(all_34_2) % 9.88/2.09 | & $i(all_34_3) & $i(all_34_4) & $i(all_34_5) & $i(all_34_6) % 9.88/2.09 | % 9.88/2.09 | ALPHA: (2) implies: % 9.88/2.09 | (3) $i(all_34_5) % 9.88/2.09 | (4) $i(all_34_2) % 9.88/2.09 | (5) left_apart_point(all_34_5, all_34_1) = 0 % 9.88/2.09 | (6) reverse_line(all_34_2) = all_34_1 % 9.88/2.09 | % 9.88/2.09 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_34_5, all_34_2, all_34_1, simplifying % 9.88/2.09 | with (3), (4), (5), (6) gives: % 9.88/2.09 | (7) $false % 9.88/2.10 | % 9.88/2.10 | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent. % 9.88/2.10 | % 9.88/2.10 End of proof % 9.88/2.10 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 9.88/2.10 % 9.88/2.10 1413ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------