↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:21:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:03:37 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.53  % Version:  1.5
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.16/0.53  fof(oag10,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~(left_apart_point(A,L)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax', oag10)).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c66,plain,(![A]:(![L]:(~left_apart_point(A,L)&~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c67,plain,((![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,L)))&(![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c66])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c69,plain,(![X43]:(![X44]:(![X45]:(![X46]:(~left_apart_point(X43,X44)&~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c68,plain,((![X43]:(![X44]:~left_apart_point(X43,X44)))&(![X45]:(![X46]:~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c67])).])).
% 0.16/0.53  cnf(c70,plain,~left_apart_point(X97,X96),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c69])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(con,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:((left_apart_point(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))=>(distinct_points(A,B)&left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(A,B),L)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:((left_apart_point(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))=>(distinct_points(A,B)&left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(A,B),L))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[L]:((left_apart_point(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))&(~distinct_points(A,B)|~left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(A,B),L)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:((left_apart_point(X2,X4)&left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X4)))&(~distinct_points(X2,X3)|~left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(X2,X3),X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.16/0.53  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((left_apart_point(skolem0001,skolem0003)&left_apart_point(skolem0002,reverse_line(skolem0003)))&(~distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002)|~left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002),skolem0003))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c2])).
% 0.16/0.53  cnf(c4,negated_conjecture,left_apart_point(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.16/0.53  cnf(c162,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4, c70])).
% 0.16/0.53  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.16/0.53  
% 0.16/0.53  % Initial clauses    : 61
% 0.16/0.53  % Processed clauses  : 6
% 0.16/0.53  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.16/0.53  % Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.16/0.53  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.16/0.53  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.16/0.53  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.16/0.53  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.16/0.53  % User time          : 0.210 s
% 0.16/0.53  % System time        : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.53  % Total time         : 0.224 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------