%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO253+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:17 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 29 ~; 15 |; 17 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 4 sgn 23 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(7,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
<=> ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpPdXEHo/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',apt_def) ).
fof(15,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpPdXEHo/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).
fof(17,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)) )
=> apart_point_and_line(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpPdXEHo/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(18,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)) )
=> apart_point_and_line(X2,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[17]) ).
fof(25,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)) )
=> apart_point_and_line(X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[18,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(44,plain,
! [X1,X3] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) )
& ( ( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) )
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
fof(45,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| left_apart_point(X4,X5)
| left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) )
& ( ( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) )
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
fof(46,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| left_apart_point(X4,X5)
| left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) )
& ( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5))
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
cnf(49,plain,
( left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| left_apart_point(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46]) ).
fof(72,plain,
! [X1,X3] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(73,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[72]) ).
cnf(75,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[73]) ).
fof(79,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
fof(80,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( apart_point_and_line(X4,X6)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X5,parallel_through_point(X6,X4))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X5,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[79]) ).
fof(81,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[80]) ).
cnf(84,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[81]) ).
cnf(93,plain,
( left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[49,75,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(94,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[93,75,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(95,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[84,94,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
$false,
95,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO253+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.22 % Computer : n023.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.22 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.22 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:22:37 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.27 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.33 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpPdXEHo/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.33 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpPdXEHo/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.33 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.33 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.33 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.33 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.33 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.33 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------