↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GEO255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:28:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  30   ~;  36   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   2 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X2,X1,X4] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X4)
        & line(X2) )
     => ~ ( before_on_line(X2,X4,X1)
          & before_on_line(X2,X1,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(oag8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( line(X3)
        & line(X2) )
     => ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
        | unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag8) ).

fof(oag5,axiom,
    ! [X2] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag5) ).

fof(oag9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
        & unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3) )
     => ( left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
        | left_convergent_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag9) ).

fof(oag11,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ~ ( left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3))
        | left_convergent_lines(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag11) ).

fof(oag6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X6] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
     => ( unequally_directed_lines(X3,X6)
        | unequally_directed_lines(X2,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag6) ).

fof(oagco9,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(X1,X4),reverse_line(line_connecting(X4,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oagco9) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2,X1,X4] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X4)
          & line(X2) )
       => ~ ( before_on_line(X2,X4,X1)
            & before_on_line(X2,X1,X4) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X35,reverse_line(X36))
      | unequally_directed_lines(X35,X36)
      | ~ line(X36)
      | ~ line(X35) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & line(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[oag5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ line(X2)
    | ~ line(X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    line(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X42] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X42,X42),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X49,X50] :
      ( left_convergent_lines(X49,reverse_line(X50))
      | left_convergent_lines(X49,X50)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X49,reverse_line(X50))
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X49,X50) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X65,X66] :
      ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X65,reverse_line(X66))
      & ~ left_convergent_lines(X65,X66) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag11])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(X44,X45)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X43,X45)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X43,X44) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ line(X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk1_0)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | left_convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(esk1_0),X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(X1,X4),reverse_line(line_connecting(X4,X1))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[oagco9]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X51,X52] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(X51,X52),reverse_line(line_connecting(X52,X51))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),reverse_line(line_connecting(X2,X1))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1)
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,line_connecting(X2,X1))
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,line_connecting(X1,X1)),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(line_connecting(X1,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_37]),c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 14:36:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % sh5l with pid 3048925 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/0.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.54  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3048932 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/0.54  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.54  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.20/0.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.20/0.54  % Initial clauses                      : 53
% 0.20/0.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 53
% 0.20/0.54  % Processed clauses                    : 159
% 0.20/0.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.20/0.54  % ...subsumed                          : 85
% 0.20/0.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 73
% 0.20/0.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.20/0.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Generated clauses                    : 286
% 0.20/0.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 213
% 0.20/0.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Paramodulations                      : 230
% 0.20/0.54  % Factorizations                       : 56
% 0.20/0.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 72
% 0.20/0.54  % ...of those cached                   : 62
% 0.20/0.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 0.20/0.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.20/0.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 0.20/0.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 47
% 0.20/0.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106
% 0.20/0.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 389
% 0.20/0.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.20/0.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 833
% 0.20/0.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 485
% 0.20/0.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 70
% 0.20/0.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106
% 0.20/0.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.20/0.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6272
% 0.20/0.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 606
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.54  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.54  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.20/0.54  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.54  % Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.54  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.20/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------