↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : GEO257+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:54:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (   8   ~;   1   |;  27   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  16   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,X1)
        | left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',ax10_basics) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        & distinct_points(X2,X3)
        & incident_point_and_line(X3,X0)
        & left_apart_point(X4,X0) )
     => ( ( before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
          & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3) )
       => before_on_line(X0,X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
          & distinct_points(X2,X3)
          & incident_point_and_line(X3,X0)
          & left_apart_point(X4,X0) )
       => ( ( before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
            & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3) )
         => before_on_line(X0,X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f37]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ before_on_line(X0,X1,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
      & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X1,X3)
      & distinct_points(X2,X3)
      & incident_point_and_line(X3,X0)
      & left_apart_point(X4,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ before_on_line(X0,X1,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
      & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X1,X3)
      & distinct_points(X2,X3)
      & incident_point_and_line(X3,X0)
      & left_apart_point(X4,X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ( ~ before_on_line(sK0,sK1,sK3)
    & before_on_line(sK0,sK1,sK2)
    & before_on_line(sK0,sK2,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK1,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK2,sK3)
    & incident_point_and_line(sK3,sK0)
    & left_apart_point(sK4,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4)],[f77]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK4,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f105,f125]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO257+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:55:04 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075454)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1924737280:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3075454-3075464"...
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)...printing done.
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075464)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.46  % (3075454)Success in time 0.032 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------