%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO261+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.09s 2.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_69,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(i_0_65,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57zclfqj/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),c_0_79]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_85])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GEO261+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:30:50 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.09/2.64 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 9.09/2.64 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.09/2.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 9.09/2.64
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof found!
% 9.09/2.64 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.09/2.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 9.09/2.64 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 9.09/2.64 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.09/2.64 # Parsed axioms : 70
% 9.09/2.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Initial clauses : 70
% 9.09/2.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 70
% 9.09/2.64 # Processed clauses : 75
% 9.09/2.64 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # ...subsumed : 19
% 9.09/2.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 9.09/2.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 9.09/2.64 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Generated clauses : 54
% 9.09/2.64 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 38
% 9.09/2.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 9.09/2.64 # Paramodulations : 40
% 9.09/2.64 # Factorizations : 14
% 9.09/2.64 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 9.09/2.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 9.09/2.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 9.09/2.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 9.09/2.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 9.09/2.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 64
% 9.09/2.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 9.09/2.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 459
% 9.09/2.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
% 9.09/2.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 9.09/2.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 9.09/2.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 9.09/2.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1772
% 9.09/2.64
% 9.09/2.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.09/2.64 # User time : 0.015 s
% 9.09/2.64 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.09/2.64 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 9.09/2.64 # ...preprocessing : 0.021 s
% 9.09/2.64 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 9.09/2.64 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 9.09/2.64
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------