↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : GEO262+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 20.22s 3.41s
% Output   : Proof 24.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO262+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:15:59 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.58/0.58  ________       _____
% 0.58/0.58  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.58/0.58  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.58/0.58  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.58/0.58  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.58/0.58  (2023-06-19)
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.58/0.58  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.58/0.58                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.58/0.58  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.58/0.59  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.58/0.60  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 3.68/1.19  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.19  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.23  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.23  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.23  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.23  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.68/1.23  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.40/1.67  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.02/1.78  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 8.24/1.79  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.24/1.80  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.24/1.81  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.60/2.02  Prover 3: gave up
% 9.60/2.02  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.36/2.08  Prover 6: gave up
% 10.36/2.08  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 10.36/2.11  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.36/2.11  Prover 1: gave up
% 10.75/2.13  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 10.75/2.13  Prover 9: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 10.96/2.18  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.96/2.19  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 11.53/2.26  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.93/2.28  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 11.93/2.28  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.48/2.36  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.63/2.39  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.86/2.57  Prover 8: gave up
% 13.86/2.57  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 14.23/2.62  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 14.75/2.66  Prover 7: gave up
% 14.90/2.68  Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.90/2.68  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 14.90/2.71  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.90/2.72  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.90/2.72  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 16.22/2.87  Prover 10: gave up
% 16.22/2.87  Prover 12: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=2024365391
% 16.49/2.92  Prover 12: Preprocessing ...
% 17.51/3.05  Prover 12: Proving ...
% 17.83/3.07  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.22/3.41  Prover 2: proved (2808ms)
% 20.22/3.41  
% 20.22/3.41  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.22/3.41  
% 20.22/3.42  Prover 12: stopped
% 20.22/3.42  Prover 0: stopped
% 20.22/3.42  Prover 5: stopped
% 20.22/3.43  Prover 9: stopped
% 20.22/3.43  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 20.22/3.43  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 20.22/3.44  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 20.75/3.46  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 20.75/3.46  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 21.09/3.49  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 21.09/3.53  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.09/3.54  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.09/3.54  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.54/3.54  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.68/3.59  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.68/3.60  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 24.52/3.93  Prover 13: Found proof (size 32)
% 24.52/3.93  Prover 13: proved (508ms)
% 24.52/3.93  Prover 4: stopped
% 24.52/3.95  Prover 16: stopped
% 24.52/3.95  Prover 19: stopped
% 24.52/3.95  Prover 11: stopped
% 24.52/3.95  
% 24.52/3.95  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 24.52/3.95  
% 24.52/3.95  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 24.67/3.96  Assumptions after simplification:
% 24.67/3.96  ---------------------------------
% 24.67/3.96  
% 24.67/3.96    (a1_defns)
% 24.67/3.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 24.67/3.98      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v2) |
% 24.67/3.98      unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 24.67/3.98    [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/3.98      unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1) | unequally_directed_lines(v0,
% 24.67/3.98        v2))
% 24.67/3.98  
% 24.67/3.98    (a7_defns)
% 24.67/3.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ convergent_lines(v0,
% 24.67/3.98        v1) | unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 24.67/3.98      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ convergent_lines(v0, v1) |
% 24.67/3.98      unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 24.67/3.98      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) |  ~
% 24.67/3.98      unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1) | convergent_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/3.98  
% 24.67/3.98    (ax11_basics)
% 24.67/3.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 24.67/3.98      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ left_convergent_lines(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 24.67/3.98    [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ left_convergent_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/3.98  
% 24.67/3.98    (ax6_cons_objs)
% 24.67/3.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) =
% 24.67/3.99        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) |  ? [v3: $i] : (reverse_line(v1) = v3 &
% 24.67/3.99        $i(v3) &  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 24.67/3.99    :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0)
% 24.67/3.99      |  ~ apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) |  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) |  ?
% 24.67/3.99      [v3: $i] : (reverse_line(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0,
% 24.67/3.99          v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 24.67/3.99      (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & reverse_line(v1) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 24.67/3.99        ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v2) | ( ~ apart_point_and_line(v3, v1) & 
% 24.67/3.99            ~ apart_point_and_line(v3, v0)))))
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99    (ax9_basics)
% 24.67/3.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v2) |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) | left_convergent_lines(v0, v2) |
% 24.67/3.99      left_convergent_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99    (con)
% 24.67/3.99     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 24.67/3.99      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] :
% 24.67/3.99    (parallel_through_point(v2, v5) = v8 & parallel_through_point(v2, v3) = v6 &
% 24.67/3.99      intersection_point(v1, v8) = v9 & intersection_point(v1, v6) = v7 & $i(v9) &
% 24.67/3.99      $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 24.67/3.99      $i(v0) & between_on_line(v0, v3, v4, v5) & incident_point_and_line(v4, v2) &
% 24.67/3.99      incident_point_and_line(v4, v1) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) &
% 24.67/3.99      convergent_lines(v0, v2) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) &  ~ between_on_line(v1,
% 24.67/3.99        v7, v4, v9))
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99    (function-axioms)
% 24.67/3.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) =
% 24.67/3.99        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 24.67/3.99      ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 24.67/3.99    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 24.67/3.99      (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 24.67/3.99    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (reverse_line(v2) = v1) |
% 24.67/3.99       ~ (reverse_line(v2) = v0))
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 24.67/3.99  --------------------------------------------
% 24.67/3.99  a2_defns, a3_defns, a4_defns, a5_defns, a6_defns, a8_defns, a9_defns,
% 24.67/3.99  ax10_basics, ax10_cons_objs, ax1_basics, ax1_cons_objs, ax1_subs, ax1_uniq_cons,
% 24.67/3.99  ax2_basics, ax2_cons_objs, ax2_subs, ax2_uniq_cons, ax3_basics, ax3_cons_objs,
% 24.67/3.99  ax3_subs, ax4_basics, ax4_cons_objs, ax4_defns, ax5_basics, ax5_cons_objs,
% 24.67/3.99  ax6_basics, ax7_basics, ax7_cons_objs, ax8_basics, ax8_cons_objs, ax9_cons_objs
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 24.67/3.99  ---------------------------------
% 24.67/3.99  
% 24.67/3.99  Begin of proof
% 24.67/3.99  | 
% 24.67/3.99  | ALPHA: (a1_defns) implies:
% 24.67/3.99  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |
% 24.67/3.99  |           ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1)
% 24.67/3.99  |          | unequally_directed_lines(v0, v2))
% 24.67/3.99  | 
% 24.67/3.99  | ALPHA: (a7_defns) implies:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |          convergent_lines(v0, v1) | unequally_directed_opposite_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/4.00  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |          convergent_lines(v0, v1) | unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | ALPHA: (ax11_basics) implies:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |          left_convergent_lines(v0, v1))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | ALPHA: (ax6_cons_objs) implies:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |          unequally_directed_lines(v0, v1) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 24.67/4.00  |          (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & reverse_line(v1) = v2 & $i(v3) &
% 24.67/4.00  |            $i(v2) & ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(v0, v2) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.00  |                apart_point_and_line(v3, v1) &  ~ apart_point_and_line(v3,
% 24.67/4.00  |                  v0)))))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |          (reverse_line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (reverse_line(v2) = v0))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_49_0, all_49_1, all_49_2,
% 24.67/4.00  |        all_49_3, all_49_4, all_49_5, all_49_6, all_49_7, all_49_8, all_49_9
% 24.67/4.00  |        gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (7)  parallel_through_point(all_49_7, all_49_4) = all_49_1 &
% 24.67/4.00  |        parallel_through_point(all_49_7, all_49_6) = all_49_3 &
% 24.67/4.00  |        intersection_point(all_49_8, all_49_1) = all_49_0 &
% 24.67/4.00  |        intersection_point(all_49_8, all_49_3) = all_49_2 & $i(all_49_0) &
% 24.67/4.00  |        $i(all_49_1) & $i(all_49_2) & $i(all_49_3) & $i(all_49_4) &
% 24.67/4.00  |        $i(all_49_5) & $i(all_49_6) & $i(all_49_7) & $i(all_49_8) &
% 24.67/4.00  |        $i(all_49_9) & between_on_line(all_49_9, all_49_6, all_49_5, all_49_4)
% 24.67/4.00  |        & incident_point_and_line(all_49_5, all_49_7) &
% 24.67/4.00  |        incident_point_and_line(all_49_5, all_49_8) &
% 24.67/4.00  |        convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7) & convergent_lines(all_49_9,
% 24.67/4.00  |          all_49_7) & convergent_lines(all_49_9, all_49_8) &  ~
% 24.67/4.00  |        between_on_line(all_49_8, all_49_2, all_49_5, all_49_0)
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (8)  convergent_lines(all_49_9, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  |   (9)  convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  |   (10)  $i(all_49_9)
% 24.67/4.00  |   (11)  $i(all_49_8)
% 24.67/4.00  |   (12)  $i(all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_49_9, all_49_7, simplifying with (8),
% 24.67/4.00  |              (10), (12) gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (13)  unequally_directed_lines(all_49_9, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_49_8, all_49_7, simplifying with (9),
% 24.67/4.00  |              (11), (12) gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (14)  unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_49_8, all_49_7, simplifying with (9),
% 24.67/4.00  |              (11), (12) gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (15)  unequally_directed_opposite_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_49_9, all_49_7, simplifying with (10),
% 24.67/4.00  |              (12), (13) gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (16)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (intersection_point(all_49_9, all_49_7) =
% 24.67/4.00  |           v1 & reverse_line(all_49_7) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~
% 24.67/4.00  |             unequally_directed_lines(all_49_9, v0) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.00  |               apart_point_and_line(v1, all_49_7) &  ~ apart_point_and_line(v1,
% 24.67/4.00  |                 all_49_9))))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_49_8, all_49_7, simplifying with (11),
% 24.67/4.00  |              (12), (14) gives:
% 24.67/4.00  |   (17)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (intersection_point(all_49_8, all_49_7) =
% 24.67/4.00  |           v1 & reverse_line(all_49_7) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~
% 24.67/4.00  |             unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, v0) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.00  |               apart_point_and_line(v1, all_49_7) &  ~ apart_point_and_line(v1,
% 24.67/4.00  |                 all_49_8))))
% 24.67/4.00  | 
% 24.67/4.00  | DELTA: instantiating (17) with fresh symbols all_62_0, all_62_1 gives:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (18)  intersection_point(all_49_8, all_49_7) = all_62_0 &
% 24.67/4.01  |         reverse_line(all_49_7) = all_62_1 & $i(all_62_0) & $i(all_62_1) & ( ~
% 24.67/4.01  |           unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.01  |             apart_point_and_line(all_62_0, all_49_7) &  ~
% 24.67/4.01  |             apart_point_and_line(all_62_0, all_49_8)))
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | ALPHA: (18) implies:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (19)  reverse_line(all_49_7) = all_62_1
% 24.67/4.01  |   (20)   ~ unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.01  |           apart_point_and_line(all_62_0, all_49_7) &  ~
% 24.67/4.01  |           apart_point_and_line(all_62_0, all_49_8))
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | DELTA: instantiating (16) with fresh symbols all_64_0, all_64_1 gives:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (21)  intersection_point(all_49_9, all_49_7) = all_64_0 &
% 24.67/4.01  |         reverse_line(all_49_7) = all_64_1 & $i(all_64_0) & $i(all_64_1) & ( ~
% 24.67/4.01  |           unequally_directed_lines(all_49_9, all_64_1) | ( ~
% 24.67/4.01  |             apart_point_and_line(all_64_0, all_49_7) &  ~
% 24.67/4.01  |             apart_point_and_line(all_64_0, all_49_9)))
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | ALPHA: (21) implies:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (22)  $i(all_64_1)
% 24.67/4.01  |   (23)  reverse_line(all_49_7) = all_64_1
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_62_1, all_64_1, all_49_7, simplifying
% 24.67/4.01  |              with (19), (23) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (24)  all_64_1 = all_62_1
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | REDUCE: (22), (24) imply:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (25)  $i(all_62_1)
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_49_8, all_49_7, all_62_1, simplifying
% 24.67/4.01  |              with (11), (12), (15), (19) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  |   (26)  unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1)
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | BETA: splitting (20) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  | Case 1:
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | |   (27)   ~ unequally_directed_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1)
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | PRED_UNIFY: (26), (27) imply:
% 24.67/4.01  | |   (28)  $false
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent.
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | Case 2:
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax9_basics) with all_49_8, all_49_7, all_62_1,
% 24.67/4.01  | |              simplifying with (11), (12), (14), (19), (26) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  | |   (29)  left_convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1) |
% 24.67/4.01  | |         left_convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | BETA: splitting (29) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | Case 1:
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | |   (30)  left_convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_62_1)
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_8, all_62_1, simplifying with
% 24.67/4.01  | | |              (11), (25), (30) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  | | |   (31)  $false
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | | CLOSE: (31) is inconsistent.
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | Case 2:
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | |   (32)  left_convergent_lines(all_49_8, all_49_7)
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_49_8, all_49_7, simplifying with
% 24.67/4.01  | | |              (11), (12), (32) gives:
% 24.67/4.01  | | |   (33)  $false
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | | CLOSE: (33) is inconsistent.
% 24.67/4.01  | | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | | End of split
% 24.67/4.01  | | 
% 24.67/4.01  | End of split
% 24.67/4.01  | 
% 24.67/4.01  End of proof
% 24.67/4.01  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 24.67/4.01  
% 24.67/4.01  3430ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------