↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO264+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:20:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.28s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   6   ~;   1   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   2 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X4,X5,X7] :
      ( left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X1,X4))
     => ( ( left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X4,X5)))
          & left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X5,X1))) )
       => left_apart_point(X7,line_connecting(X1,X4)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(oag10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X2)
        | left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag10) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X4,X5,X7] :
        ( left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X1,X4))
       => ( ( left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X4,X5)))
            & left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(line_connecting(X5,X1))) )
         => left_apart_point(X7,line_connecting(X1,X4)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    & left_apart_point(esk4_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    & left_apart_point(esk4_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0)))
    & ~ left_apart_point(esk4_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X116,X117] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X116,X117)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X116,reverse_line(X117)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO264+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:50:24 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.28/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.28/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.62  % Total time : 1.272s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------