↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO264+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:21:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.67s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : GEO264+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:21:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.67  % Version:  1.5
% 0.48/0.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.48/0.67  fof(oag10,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~(left_apart_point(A,L)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax', oag10)).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c68,plain,(![A]:(![L]:(~left_apart_point(A,L)&~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c69,plain,((![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,L)))&(![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c68])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c71,plain,(![X44]:(![X45]:(![X46]:(![X47]:(~left_apart_point(X44,X45)&~left_apart_point(X46,reverse_line(X47))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c70,plain,((![X44]:(![X45]:~left_apart_point(X44,X45)))&(![X46]:(![X47]:~left_apart_point(X46,reverse_line(X47))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c69])).])).
% 0.48/0.67  cnf(c72,plain,~left_apart_point(X97,X98),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c71])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(con,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))=>((left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(B,C)))&left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(C,A))))=>left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(![D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))=>((left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(B,C)))&left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(C,A))))=>left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[C]:(?[D]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))&((left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(B,C)))&left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(C,A))))&~left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[C]:(left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))&(?[D]:((left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(B,C)))&left_apart_point(D,reverse_line(line_connecting(C,A))))&~left_apart_point(D,line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(left_apart_point(X4,line_connecting(X2,X3))&(?[X5]:((left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X3,X4)))&left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X4,X2))))&~left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X2,X3)))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.48/0.67  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(left_apart_point(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002))&((left_apart_point(skolem0004,reverse_line(line_connecting(skolem0002,skolem0003)))&left_apart_point(skolem0004,reverse_line(line_connecting(skolem0003,skolem0001))))&~left_apart_point(skolem0004,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).
% 0.48/0.67  cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,left_apart_point(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 0.48/0.67  cnf(c164,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5, c72])).
% 0.48/0.67  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.48/0.67  
% 0.48/0.67  % Initial clauses    : 62
% 0.48/0.67  % Processed clauses  : 6
% 0.48/0.67  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.48/0.67  % Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.48/0.67  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.48/0.67  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.48/0.67  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.48/0.67  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.48/0.67  % User time          : 0.279 s
% 0.48/0.67  % System time        : 0.022 s
% 0.48/0.67  % Total time         : 0.301 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------