↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : GEO264+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:54:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (   9   ~;   1   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  16   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,X1)
        | left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',ax10_basics) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
     => ( ( right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
          & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X2,X0)) )
       => left_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
       => ( ( right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
            & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X2,X0)) )
         => left_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f37]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
      & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X2,X0))
      & left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
      & right_apart_point(X3,line_connecting(X2,X0))
      & left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ( ~ left_apart_point(sK3,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    & right_apart_point(sK3,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
    & right_apart_point(sK3,line_connecting(sK2,sK0))
    & left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f77]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f118,f127]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO264+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:55:56 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667824)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3835481838:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2667824-2667831"...
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)...printing done.
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667831)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.45  % (2667824)Success in time 0.026 s
% 0.12/0.45  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------