↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO265+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  10   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(a1_defns,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X,Y)
    <=> unequally_directed_lines(X,reverse_line(Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a1_defns) ).

fof(a4_defns,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equally_directed_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a4_defns) ).

fof(a5_defns,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equally_directed_opposite_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a5_defns) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [L,M] :
      ( equally_directed_lines(L,reverse_line(M))
     => equally_directed_opposite_lines(L,M) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L,M] :
        ( equally_directed_lines(L,reverse_line(M))
       => equally_directed_opposite_lines(L,M) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))
    | ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a1_defns]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(A,B)
    | equally_directed_opposite_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a5_defns]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(A,B)
    | ~ equally_directed_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a4_defns]) ).

fof(nnf_37,plain,
    ? [L,M] :
      ( ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(L,M)
      & equally_directed_lines(L,reverse_line(M)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(sK0,sK1)
    & equally_directed_lines(sK0,reverse_line(sK1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(L,sK0),skolemize(M,sK1)],[nnf_37]) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    equally_directed_lines(sK0,reverse_line(sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))
    | equally_directed_opposite_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_39]) ).

cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equally_directed_opposite_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    unequally_directed_lines(sK0,reverse_line(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK0,reverse_line(sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_47]) ).

cnf(c_134,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_133]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO265+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:07:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 2346664 was started by sandbox2 on n017,
% 0.10/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 13:07:02 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.37  
% 0.10/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.38  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.13/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 4.000.
% 0.13/0.38  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------