%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO267+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 1.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 9 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 2 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X8] :
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X4,X5)
=> ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X5,X8)
| unequally_directed_lines(X5,X8) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(a1_defns,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
<=> unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',a1_defns) ).
fof(ax8_basics,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( unequally_directed_lines(X4,X5)
| unequally_directed_lines(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',ax8_basics) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5,X8] :
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X4,X5)
=> ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X5,X8)
| unequally_directed_lines(X5,X8) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X3,X4)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,reverse_line(X4)) )
& ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,reverse_line(X4))
| unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a1_defns])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( unequally_directed_lines(X6,X7)
| unequally_directed_lines(X6,reverse_line(X7)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax8_basics]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : GEO267+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.07/0.26 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.07/0.26 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 09:08:58 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/1.31 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.12/1.31 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.12/1.31 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.12/1.31
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof found!
% 0.12/1.31 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/1.31 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.12/1.31 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.12/1.31 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.12/1.31 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.12/1.31 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 32
% 0.12/1.31 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.12/1.31 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.12/1.31 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.12/1.31 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.12/1.31 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.12/1.31 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.12/1.31 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6
% 0.12/1.31 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.12/1.31 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.12/1.31 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.12/1.31 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/1.31 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.12/1.31 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.12/1.31 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.12/1.31 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.12/1.31 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.12/1.31 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.12/1.31 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.12/1.31 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/1.31 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1051
% 0.12/1.31
% 0.12/1.31 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/1.31 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.12/1.31 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.12/1.31 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/1.31 # Maximum resident set size: 2740 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------