↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO267+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:45:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.91s 2.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47o3tnwn/input.p',i_0_68) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47o3tnwn/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_63,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47o3tnwn/input.p',i_0_63) ).

cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-47o3tnwn/input.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_68 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    i_0_63 ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_77]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : GEO267+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 09:06:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 6.91/2.34  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.91/2.34  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.91/2.34  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 6.91/2.34  
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof found!
% 6.91/2.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.91/2.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 6.91/2.34  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 6.91/2.34  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.91/2.34  # Parsed axioms                        : 69
% 6.91/2.34  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Initial clauses                      : 69
% 6.91/2.34  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 69
% 6.91/2.34  # Processed clauses                    : 75
% 6.91/2.34  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # ...subsumed                          : 19
% 6.91/2.34  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 6.91/2.34  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 6.91/2.34  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Generated clauses                    : 52
% 6.91/2.34  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 35
% 6.91/2.34  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
% 6.91/2.34  # Paramodulations                      : 46
% 6.91/2.34  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 6.91/2.34  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Current number of processed clauses  : 54
% 6.91/2.34  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 6.91/2.34  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.91/2.34  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 6.91/2.34  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 6.91/2.34  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 6.91/2.34  # ...number of literals in the above   : 66
% 6.91/2.34  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 6.91/2.34  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 536
% 6.91/2.34  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 349
% 6.91/2.34  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 6.91/2.34  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153
% 6.91/2.34  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 6.91/2.34  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.91/2.34  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1755
% 6.91/2.34  
% 6.91/2.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.91/2.34  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 6.91/2.34  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 6.91/2.34  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 6.91/2.34  # ...preprocessing         : 0.016 s
% 6.91/2.34  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 6.91/2.34  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 6.91/2.34  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------