↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO269+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:05:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.35s 2.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : GEO269+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 06:53:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.50/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 2.35/2.41  %-------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.41  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 2.35/2.41  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 2.35/2.41  % Transform   :cnf
% 2.35/2.41  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 2.35/2.41  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 2.35/2.41  
% 2.35/2.41  % Result      :Theorem 1.810000s
% 2.35/2.41  % Output      :CNFRefutation 1.810000s
% 2.35/2.41  %-------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.41  % File     : GEO269+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 2.35/2.41  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 2.35/2.41  % Problem  : Equally directed opposite reveresed lines
% 2.35/2.41  % Version  : [vPl98] axioms.
% 2.35/2.41  % English  :
% 2.35/2.41  
% 2.35/2.41  % Refs     : [vPl98] von Plato (1998), A Constructive Theory of Ordered Aff
% 2.35/2.41  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 2.35/2.41  %          : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 2.35/2.41  % Source   : [Rat07]
% 2.35/2.41  % Names    : Theorem 3.13 [vPl98]
% 2.35/2.41  
% 2.35/2.41  % Status   : Theorem
% 2.35/2.41  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0
% 2.35/2.41  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Number of atoms       :  110 (   0 equ)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Number of connectives :   85 (  12   ~;  22   |;  24   &)
% 2.35/2.41  %                                         (  10 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Number of predicates  :   18 (  18 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 2.35/2.41  %            Number of variables   :   82 (  82   !;   0   ?)
% 2.35/2.41  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 2.35/2.41  
% 2.35/2.41  % Comments :
% 2.35/2.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.41  include('Axioms/GEO009+0.ax').
% 2.35/2.42  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.42  fof(con,conjecture,
% 2.35/2.42      ! [L] : equally_directed_opposite_lines(L,reverse_line(L)) ).
% 2.35/2.42  
% 2.35/2.42  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.42  % Proof found
% 2.35/2.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.35/2.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.35/2.42  %ClaNum:67(EqnAxiom:0)
% 2.35/2.42  %VarNum:311(SingletonVarNum:129)
% 2.35/2.42  %MaxLitNum:10
% 2.35/2.42  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 2.35/2.42  %SharedTerms:3
% 2.35/2.42  %goalClause: 7
% 2.35/2.42  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 2.35/2.42  [7]~P10(a2,f5(a2))
% 2.35/2.42  [1]P1(x11,x11)
% 2.35/2.42  [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 2.35/2.42  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 2.35/2.42  [10]~P3(x101,f5(x101))
% 2.35/2.42  [3]~P9(x31,x32)
% 2.35/2.42  [4]~P12(x41,x42)
% 2.35/2.42  [2]P1(f1(x21,x22),x21)
% 2.35/2.42  [11]~P4(x111,f1(x112,x111))
% 2.35/2.42  [12]~P13(x121)+P13(f5(x121))
% 2.35/2.42  [13]P10(x131,x132)+P14(x131,x132)
% 2.35/2.42  [14]P1(x141,x142)+P15(x141,x142)
% 2.35/2.42  [16]~P5(x161,x162)+P14(x161,x162)
% 2.35/2.42  [17]~P5(x171,x172)+P15(x171,x172)
% 2.35/2.42  [18]~P16(x181,x182)+P4(x181,x182)
% 2.35/2.42  [24]~P10(x241,x242)+~P14(x241,x242)
% 2.35/2.42  [25]~P1(x251,x252)+~P15(x251,x252)
% 2.35/2.42  [15]P15(x151,x152)+P15(x151,f5(x152))
% 2.35/2.42  [20]~P14(x201,x202)+P15(x201,f5(x202))
% 2.35/2.42  [21]~P16(x211,x212)+P9(x211,f5(x212))
% 2.35/2.42  [22]~P18(x221,x222)+P12(x221,f5(x222))
% 2.35/2.42  [26]P14(x261,x262)+~P15(x261,f5(x262))
% 2.35/2.42  [39]~P2(x391,x392)+~P4(x392,f3(x391,x392))
% 2.35/2.42  [40]~P2(x401,x402)+~P4(x401,f3(x401,x402))
% 2.35/2.42  [58]~P2(x581,x582)+P1(f3(x581,x582),f5(f3(x582,x581)))
% 2.35/2.42  [49]P2(x491,x492)+~P6(x493,x491,x492)
% 2.35/2.42  [50]P11(x501,x502)+~P6(x502,x503,x501)
% 2.35/2.42  [51]P11(x511,x512)+~P6(x512,x511,x513)
% 2.35/2.42  [59]~P6(x591,x592,x593)+P1(x591,f3(x592,x593))
% 2.35/2.42  [31]P9(x311,x312)+~P4(x311,x312)+P16(x311,x312)
% 2.35/2.42  [35]~P14(x351,x352)+~P15(x351,x352)+P5(x351,x352)
% 2.35/2.42  [23]~P17(x232)+~P13(x231)+P13(f1(x231,x232))
% 2.35/2.42  [56]~P15(x561,x562)+~P15(x561,f5(x562))+~P4(f4(x561,x562),x562)
% 2.35/2.42  [57]~P15(x571,x572)+~P15(x571,f5(x572))+~P4(f4(x571,x572),x571)
% 2.35/2.42  [29]~P15(x293,x291)+P15(x291,x292)+P15(x293,x292)
% 2.35/2.42  [33]~P2(x333,x331)+P2(x331,x332)+P2(x333,x332)
% 2.35/2.42  [34]~P3(x343,x341)+P3(x341,x342)+P3(x343,x342)
% 2.35/2.42  [52]~P8(x522,x523,x521)+P16(x521,x522)+P16(x523,x522)
% 2.35/2.42  [53]P9(x531,x532)+P16(x531,x532)+~P8(x532,x533,x531)
% 2.35/2.42  [54]P9(x541,x542)+P16(x541,x542)+~P8(x542,x541,x543)
% 2.35/2.42  [55]~P8(x552,x551,x553)+P9(x551,x552)+P9(x553,x552)
% 2.35/2.42  [62]~P6(x621,x623,x622)+~P6(x621,x624,x623)+P7(x621,x622,x623,x624)
% 2.35/2.42  [63]~P6(x631,x633,x634)+~P6(x631,x632,x633)+P7(x631,x632,x633,x634)
% 2.35/2.42  [64]~P7(x641,x642,x643,x644)+P6(x641,x642,x643)+P6(x641,x644,x643)
% 2.35/2.42  [65]P6(x651,x653,x652)+P6(x651,x652,x653)+~P7(x651,x654,x652,x653)
% 2.35/2.42  [66]P6(x661,x663,x662)+P6(x661,x662,x663)+~P7(x661,x662,x663,x664)
% 2.35/2.42  [67]~P7(x671,x674,x672,x673)+P6(x671,x672,x673)+P6(x671,x672,x674)
% 2.35/2.42  [36]~P17(x362)+~P17(x361)+~P2(x361,x362)+P13(f3(x361,x362))
% 2.35/2.42  [43]~P15(x431,x432)+P12(x431,x432)+P12(x431,f5(x432))+~P15(x431,f5(x432))
% 2.35/2.42  [41]~P15(x411,x413)+P15(x411,x412)+~P15(x411,f5(x413))+P15(x413,f5(x412))
% 2.35/2.42  [42]~P15(x423,x421)+P15(x421,x422)+~P15(x423,f5(x421))+P15(x423,f5(x422))
% 2.35/2.42  [45]~P13(x452)+~P13(x451)+~P15(x451,x452)+~P15(x451,f5(x452))+P17(f4(x451,x452))
% 2.35/2.42  [61]~P2(x612,x613)+~P11(x613,x611)+~P11(x612,x611)+P6(x611,x612,x613)+~P1(x611,f3(x612,x613))
% 2.35/2.42  [60]P9(x604,x603)+~P2(x604,x601)+~P3(x603,x602)+P9(x601,x602)+P9(x601,x603)+P9(x604,x602)+P9(x601,f5(x602))+P9(x601,f5(x603))+P9(x604,f5(x602))+P9(x604,f5(x603))
% 2.35/2.42  %EqnAxiom
% 2.35/2.42  
% 2.35/2.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(82,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (P12(x821,x822)+~P15(x821,x822)+~P15(x821,f5(x822))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,11,3,18,49,21,64,65,66,43])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(84,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (P15(a2,f5(f5(a2)))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,13,20])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(472,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (P15(f1(x4721,x4722),f5(x4721))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,15,25])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(473,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P1(f1(x4731,x4732),f5(x4731))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[472,25])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4197,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(f1(x41971,x41972),x41971)),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[473,4,14,82])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4199,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(f1(x41991,x41992),x41991)),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(rename_variables,[],[4197])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4202,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(f1(x42021,x42022),x42021)),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(rename_variables,[],[4197])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4208,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (P15(f5(x42081),x42081)),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[472,4197,4199,4202,15,20,13,25,29])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4211,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(f5(x42111),f5(x42111))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[472,4197,4199,4202,4,15,20,13,25,29,82])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4241,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(a2,f5(a2))+P15(a2,a2)),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,4208,4211,20,13,25,16,57,56,41])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4307,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     (~P15(a2,f5(a2))),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4241,25])).
% 2.35/2.42  cnf(4318,plain,
% 2.35/2.42     ($false),
% 2.35/2.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4307,14,15,20,17,13,25]),
% 2.35/2.42     ['proof']).
% 2.35/2.43  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.35/2.43  % Total time :1.810000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------