↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO271+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  43   ~;  37   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  14   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(theu(the(211), 1), imp(the(211)))',conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ron(vd1057,X1)
        & rcenter(vd1055,X1)
        & rcircle(X1) )
     => X1 = vd1061 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(theu(the(211), 1), imp(the(211)))') ).

fof('qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X136,X137,X138,X139,X140] :
      ( ( vf(X138,X136) = vf(X138,X137)
        & ron(X137,X140)
        & ron(X136,X139)
        & rcenter(X138,X140)
        & rcenter(X138,X139)
        & ? [X141] :
            ( X137 = X141
            & rpoint(X141) )
        & ? [X142] :
            ( X136 = X142
            & rpoint(X142) ) )
     => X139 = X140 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))') ).

fof('and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))',axiom,
    ( vd1057 = vd1058
    & vd1055 != vd1057
    & rpoint(vd1058)
    & vd1055 = vd1056
    & rpoint(vd1056) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))') ).

fof('and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))',axiom,
    ( ron(vd1057,vd1061)
    & rcenter(vd1055,vd1061)
    & rcircle(vd1061) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))') ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ron(vd1057,X1)
          & rcenter(vd1055,X1)
          & rcircle(X1) )
       => X1 = vd1061 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(211), 1), imp(the(211)))']) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X143,X144,X145,X146,X147,X148,X149] :
      ( vf(X145,X143) != vf(X145,X144)
      | ~ ron(X144,X147)
      | ~ ron(X143,X146)
      | ~ rcenter(X145,X147)
      | ~ rcenter(X145,X146)
      | X144 != X148
      | ~ rpoint(X148)
      | X143 != X149
      | ~ rpoint(X149)
      | X146 = X147 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))'])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ron(vd1057,esk1_0)
    & rcenter(vd1055,esk1_0)
    & rcircle(esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 != vd1061 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | X4 != X3
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | X6 != X5
    | ~ rcenter(X7,X1)
    | ~ rcenter(X7,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1)
    | ~ ron(X6,X2)
    | vf(X7,X4) != vf(X7,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    rcenter(vd1055,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    vd1055 = vd1056,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | vf(X3,X4) != vf(X3,X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X2)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X5,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    rcenter(vd1056,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    rcenter(vd1055,vd1061),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | vf(vd1056,X2) != vf(vd1056,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rcenter(vd1056,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    rcenter(vd1056,vd1061),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1061,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( vf(vd1056,X1) != vf(vd1056,X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1061) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rpoint(vd1058),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    vd1057 = vd1058,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(210), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(210), 1059, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(210), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(210), 2), pred(conjunct1(210), 1)))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1061) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1057,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    rpoint(vd1057),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ron(vd1057,vd1061),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(211)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(211)), 0), pred(the(211), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : GEO271+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:29:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.058 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 24
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 8
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 105
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 260
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 258
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 620
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 120
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 500
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1088
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 1281
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1208
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 160
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 1015
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 1105
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 247
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 216
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 775
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8387
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35571
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2393
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 283
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 668
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 79454
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.140 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.142 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 6344 pages
% 0.23/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------