↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO275+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:20:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.99s 1.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  101 (  42   ~;  37   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  14   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X608,X609,X610,X611,X612] :
      ( ( vf(X610,X608) = vf(X610,X609)
        & ron(X609,X612)
        & ron(X608,X611)
        & rcenter(X610,X612)
        & rcenter(X610,X611)
        & ? [X613] :
            ( X609 = X613
            & rpoint(X613) )
        & ? [X614] :
            ( X608 = X614
            & rpoint(X614) ) )
     => X611 = X612 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))') ).

fof('qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))',conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ron(vd1081,X1)
        & rcenter(vd1080,X1)
        & rcircle(X1) )
     => X1 = vd1095 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))') ).

fof('and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))',axiom,
    ( ron(vd1081,vd1095)
    & rcenter(vd1080,vd1095)
    & rcircle(vd1095) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))') ).

fof('qe(s2(plural(224)))',axiom,
    ? [X2] :
      ( vd1081 = X2
      & rpoint(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qe(s2(plural(224)))') ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X2092,X2093,X2094,X2095,X2096,X2097,X2098] :
      ( vf(X2094,X2092) != vf(X2094,X2093)
      | ~ ron(X2093,X2096)
      | ~ ron(X2092,X2095)
      | ~ rcenter(X2094,X2096)
      | ~ rcenter(X2094,X2095)
      | X2093 != X2097
      | ~ rpoint(X2097)
      | X2092 != X2098
      | ~ rpoint(X2098)
      | X2095 = X2096 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(182), 0), imp(cond(axiom(182), 0)))'])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ron(vd1081,X1)
          & rcenter(vd1080,X1)
          & rcircle(X1) )
       => X1 = vd1095 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(228), 1), imp(the(228)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X5 = X4
    | vf(X1,X2) != vf(X1,X3)
    | ~ ron(X3,X4)
    | ~ ron(X2,X5)
    | ~ rcenter(X1,X4)
    | ~ rcenter(X1,X5)
    | X3 != X6
    | ~ rpoint(X6)
    | X2 != X7
    | ~ rpoint(X7) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ron(vd1081,esk1_0)
    & rcenter(vd1080,esk1_0)
    & rcircle(esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 != vd1095 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | vf(X3,X4) != vf(X3,X5)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X5)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X2)
    | ~ rcenter(X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X5,X1)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    rcenter(vd1080,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | vf(vd1080,X2) != vf(vd1080,X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | ~ rcenter(vd1080,X1)
    | ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    rcenter(vd1080,vd1095),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1095,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ( vd1081 = esk2_0
    & rpoint(esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s2(plural(224)))'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( vf(vd1080,X1) != vf(vd1080,X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X2,vd1095) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rpoint(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vd1081 = esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1095) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1081,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rpoint(vd1081),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ron(vd1081,vd1095),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(comma_conjunct2(the(228)), 0), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(the(228)), 0), pred(the(228), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO275+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:51:29 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.99/1.91  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.99/1.91  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.99/1.91  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.99/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.99/1.92  % Total time : 1.424s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------