↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO277+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:20:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.80s 1.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  32 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  168 (  79 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  196 (  82   ~;  78   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   0 sgn  26   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( ( ? [X15] :
            ( X14 = X15
            & rpoint(X15) )
        & ? [X16] :
            ( X13 = X16
            & rpoint(X16) ) )
     => vf(X13,X14) = vf(X14,X13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))') ).

fof('qe(s1(plural(224)))',axiom,
    ? [X8] :
      ( vd1080 = X8
      & rpoint(X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qe(s1(plural(224)))') ).

fof('qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X102,X103,X104,X105] :
      ( ( ron(X103,X105)
        & ron(X103,X104)
        & ron(X102,X105)
        & ron(X102,X104)
        & ? [X106] :
            ( X105 = X106
            & rline(X106) )
        & ? [X107] :
            ( X104 = X107
            & rline(X107) )
        & X102 != X103
        & ? [X108] :
            ( X103 = X108
            & rpoint(X108) )
        & ? [X109] :
            ( X102 = X109
            & rpoint(X109) ) )
     => X104 = X105 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))') ).

fof('qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))',conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ron(vd1085,X1)
        & ron(vd1089,X1)
        & rline(X1) )
     => X1 = vd1099 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))') ).

fof('pred(225, 1)',axiom,
    rpoint(vd1086),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(225, 1)') ).

fof('pred(225, 4)',axiom,
    vd1085 = vd1086,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(225, 4)') ).

fof('holds(226, 1090, 1)',axiom,
    vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(226, 1090, 1)') ).

fof('pred(226, 0)',axiom,
    rpoint(vd1089),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(226, 0)') ).

fof('qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X92,X93] :
      ( ( ? [X94] :
            ( X93 = X94
            & rpoint(X94) )
        & ? [X95] :
            ( X92 = X95
            & rpoint(X95) ) )
     => ( vf(X92,X93) = v0
      <=> X92 = X93 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))') ).

fof('holds(226, 1090, 0)',axiom,
    vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(226, 1090, 0)') ).

fof('and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))',axiom,
    ( ron(vd1085,vd1099)
    & ron(vd1089,vd1099)
    & rline(vd1099) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))') ).

fof('holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)',axiom,
    vd1085 != vd1080,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)') ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1499,X1500,X1501,X1502] :
      ( X1500 != X1501
      | ~ rpoint(X1501)
      | X1499 != X1502
      | ~ rpoint(X1502)
      | vf(X1499,X1500) = vf(X1500,X1499) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(166), 0), imp(cond(axiom(166), 0)))'])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ( vd1080 = esk4_0
    & rpoint(esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s1(plural(224)))'])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1588,X1589,X1590,X1591,X1592,X1593,X1594,X1595] :
      ( ~ ron(X1589,X1591)
      | ~ ron(X1589,X1590)
      | ~ ron(X1588,X1591)
      | ~ ron(X1588,X1590)
      | X1591 != X1592
      | ~ rline(X1592)
      | X1590 != X1593
      | ~ rline(X1593)
      | X1588 = X1589
      | X1589 != X1594
      | ~ rpoint(X1594)
      | X1588 != X1595
      | ~ rpoint(X1595)
      | X1590 = X1591 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))'])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ron(vd1085,X1)
          & ron(vd1089,X1)
          & rline(X1) )
       => X1 = vd1099 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(230), 1), imp(the(230)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( vf(X3,X1) = vf(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | X3 != X4
    | ~ rpoint(X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rpoint(vd1086),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 1)']) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    vd1085 = vd1086,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(225, 4)']) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rpoint(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    vd1080 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X4 = X1
    | X3 = X2
    | ~ ron(X1,X2)
    | ~ ron(X1,X3)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X3)
    | X2 != X5
    | ~ rline(X5)
    | X3 != X6
    | ~ rline(X6)
    | X1 != X7
    | ~ rpoint(X7)
    | X4 != X8
    | ~ rpoint(X8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ron(vd1085,esk1_0)
    & ron(vd1089,esk1_0)
    & rline(esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 != vd1099 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1085,vd1080),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 1)']) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( vf(X1,X2) = vf(X2,X1)
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    rpoint(vd1085),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    rpoint(vd1080),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | ~ rline(X2)
    | ~ rline(X1)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X2)
    | ~ ron(X3,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1089,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    rpoint(vd1089),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(226, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    rline(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X1578,X1579,X1580,X1581] :
      ( ( vf(X1578,X1579) != v0
        | X1578 = X1579
        | X1579 != X1580
        | ~ rpoint(X1580)
        | X1578 != X1581
        | ~ rpoint(X1581) )
      & ( X1578 != X1579
        | vf(X1578,X1579) = v0
        | X1579 != X1580
        | ~ rpoint(X1580)
        | X1578 != X1581
        | ~ rpoint(X1581) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(162), 0), imp(cond(axiom(162), 0)))'])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1089,vd1080),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(226, 1090, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1080) = vf(vd1080,vd1085),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | X2 = vd1089
    | ~ rpoint(X2)
    | ~ rline(X1)
    | ~ ron(vd1089,X1)
    | ~ ron(X2,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ron(vd1089,vd1099),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    rline(vd1099),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != vd1099,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | vf(X1,X2) != v0
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | X1 != X4
    | ~ rpoint(X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1085),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    vf(vd1080,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_33]),c_0_26]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = vd1089
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ ron(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ ron(X1,vd1099) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ron(vd1085,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ron(vd1085,vd1099),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(230))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(230))), 0), pred(the(230), 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | vf(X1,X2) != v0
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rpoint(X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    vd1085 != vd1080,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conjunct1(225), 1087, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( vf(X1,X2) = v0
    | X1 != X2
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | X1 != X4
    | ~ rpoint(X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1085) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    vd1085 = vd1089,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_25]),c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1080) != v0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_23]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( vf(X1,X1) = v0
    | ~ rpoint(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    vf(vd1089,vd1089) = vf(vd1080,vd1089),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    vf(vd1080,vd1089) != v0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_24]),c_0_26]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_29])]),c_0_52]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO277+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:51:11 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.80/1.88  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.80/1.88  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.80/1.88  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.80/1.88  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.80/1.89  % Total time : 1.423s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------