%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO284+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:28:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 232 ( 85 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 289 ( 106 ~; 104 |; 74 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 86 ( 1 sgn 22 !; 18 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('and(and(and(and(holds(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1133, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1132, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))))), 1131, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 1))))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(242), 2), pred(conjunct1(242), 1)))',axiom,
( rpoint(vd1124)
& vd1123 = vd1124
& rpoint(vd1126)
& vd1125 = vd1126
& rpoint(vd1128)
& vd1127 = vd1128
& rpoint(vd1130)
& vd1129 = vd1130
& vd1123 != vd1125
& vd1127 != vd1129
& rless(vf(vd1127,vd1129),vf(vd1123,vd1125)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(and(and(and(holds(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1133, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1132, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))))), 1131, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 1))))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(242), 2), pred(conjunct1(242), 1)))') ).
fof('qe(259)',conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( rline(X1)
& ron(vd1123,X1)
& ron(vd1125,X1)
& rcircle(X2)
& rcenter(vd1123,X2)
& ron(vd1127,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qe(259)') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(1), 0), imp(cond(axiom(1), 0)))',axiom,
! [X107,X108] :
( rcenter(X107,X108)
=> ? [X109,X110] :
( rpoint(X109)
& X107 = X109
& rcircle(X110)
& X108 = X110 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(1), 0), imp(cond(axiom(1), 0)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(53), 0), imp(cond(axiom(53), 0)))',axiom,
! [X39,X40] :
( ( ? [X42] :
( rpoint(X42)
& X39 = X42 )
& ? [X41] :
( rpoint(X41)
& X40 = X41 )
& X39 != X40 )
=> ? [X43] :
( rcircle(X43)
& rcenter(X39,X43)
& ron(X40,X43) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(53), 0), imp(cond(axiom(53), 0)))') ).
fof('holds(258, 1150, 0)',axiom,
vd1123 = vd1129,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(258, 1150, 0)') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))',axiom,
! [X53,X54] :
( ( ? [X56] :
( rpoint(X56)
& X53 = X56 )
& ? [X55] :
( rpoint(X55)
& X54 = X55 )
& X53 != X54 )
=> ? [X57] :
( rline(X57)
& ron(X53,X57)
& ron(X54,X57) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))') ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
( rpoint(vd1124)
& vd1123 = vd1124
& rpoint(vd1126)
& vd1125 = vd1126
& rpoint(vd1128)
& vd1127 = vd1128
& rpoint(vd1130)
& vd1129 = vd1130
& vd1123 != vd1125
& vd1127 != vd1129
& rless(vf(vd1127,vd1129),vf(vd1123,vd1125)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['and(and(and(and(holds(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1133, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))))), 1132, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))))), 1131, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(242)))), 1))))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(242))), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 2), pred(conjunct1(conjunct2(242)), 1))), and(pred(conjunct1(242), 2), pred(conjunct1(242), 1)))']) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( rline(X1)
& ron(vd1123,X1)
& ron(vd1125,X1)
& rcircle(X2)
& rcenter(vd1123,X2)
& ron(vd1127,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qe(259)']) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X851,X852] :
( ( ~ rcenter(X851,X852)
| rpoint(esk7_2(X851,X852)) )
& ( ~ rcenter(X851,X852)
| X851 = esk7_2(X851,X852) )
& ( ~ rcenter(X851,X852)
| rcircle(esk8_2(X851,X852)) )
& ( ~ rcenter(X851,X852)
| X852 = esk8_2(X851,X852) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(1), 0), imp(cond(axiom(1), 0)))'])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X39,X40] :
( ( ? [X42] :
( rpoint(X42)
& X39 = X42 )
& ? [X41] :
( rpoint(X41)
& X40 = X41 )
& X39 != X40 )
=> ? [X43] :
( rcircle(X43)
& rcenter(X39,X43)
& ron(X40,X43) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(53), 0), imp(cond(axiom(53), 0)))']) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( rpoint(vd1124)
& vd1123 = vd1124
& rpoint(vd1126)
& vd1125 = vd1126
& rpoint(vd1128)
& vd1127 = vd1128
& rpoint(vd1130)
& vd1129 = vd1130
& vd1123 != vd1125
& vd1127 != vd1129
& rless(vf(vd1127,vd1129),vf(vd1123,vd1125)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X739,X740] :
( ~ rline(X739)
| ~ ron(vd1123,X739)
| ~ ron(vd1125,X739)
| ~ rcircle(X740)
| ~ rcenter(vd1123,X740)
| ~ ron(vd1127,X740) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ rcenter(X1,X2)
| rcircle(esk8_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ rcenter(X2,X1)
| X1 = esk8_2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X777,X778,X779,X780] :
( ( ~ rpoint(X780)
| X777 != X780
| ~ rpoint(X779)
| X778 != X779
| X777 = X778
| rcircle(esk3_2(X777,X778)) )
& ( ~ rpoint(X780)
| X777 != X780
| ~ rpoint(X779)
| X778 != X779
| X777 = X778
| rcenter(X777,esk3_2(X777,X778)) )
& ( ~ rpoint(X780)
| X777 != X780
| ~ rpoint(X779)
| X778 != X779
| X777 = X778
| ron(X778,esk3_2(X777,X778)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
vd1129 = vd1130,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
vd1123 = vd1129,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(258, 1150, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rline(X2)
| ~ ron(vd1123,X2)
| ~ ron(vd1125,X2)
| ~ rcircle(X1)
| ~ rcenter(vd1123,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1127,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ rcenter(X2,X1)
| rcircle(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X4)
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X2 != X3
| X1 = X2
| rcenter(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
rpoint(vd1130),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
vd1130 = vd1123,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X53,X54] :
( ( ? [X56] :
( rpoint(X56)
& X53 = X56 )
& ? [X55] :
( rpoint(X55)
& X54 = X55 )
& X53 != X54 )
=> ? [X57] :
( rline(X57)
& ron(X53,X57)
& ron(X54,X57) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ron(vd1125,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1123,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1127,X2)
| ~ rcenter(vd1123,X2)
| ~ rline(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| rcenter(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
rpoint(vd1123),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| X2 = X1
| ron(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
rpoint(vd1128),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
vd1127 = vd1128,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
vd1127 != vd1129,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X791,X792,X793,X794] :
( ( ~ rpoint(X794)
| X791 != X794
| ~ rpoint(X793)
| X792 != X793
| X791 = X792
| rline(esk5_2(X791,X792)) )
& ( ~ rpoint(X794)
| X791 != X794
| ~ rpoint(X793)
| X792 != X793
| X791 = X792
| ron(X791,esk5_2(X791,X792)) )
& ( ~ rpoint(X794)
| X791 != X794
| ~ rpoint(X793)
| X792 != X793
| X791 = X792
| ron(X792,esk5_2(X791,X792)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ron(vd1125,X2)
| ~ ron(vd1123,X2)
| ~ ron(vd1127,esk3_2(vd1123,X1))
| ~ rline(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| vd1123 = X1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ron(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
rpoint(vd1127),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
vd1127 != vd1123,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X4)
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X2 != X3
| X1 = X2
| rline(esk5_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ron(vd1125,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1123,X1)
| ~ rline(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_25])]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| rline(esk5_2(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X4)
| X1 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X2 != X3
| X1 = X2
| ron(X1,esk5_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
rpoint(vd1126),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
vd1125 = vd1126,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ron(vd1125,esk5_2(X1,X2))
| ~ ron(vd1123,esk5_2(X1,X2))
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ron(X1,esk5_2(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
rpoint(vd1125),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X4)
| X2 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X1 != X3
| X2 = X1
| ron(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ron(vd1123,esk5_2(vd1125,X1))
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| vd1125 = X1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ron(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
vd1123 != vd1125,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_25]),c_0_43])]),c_0_47]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO284+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.66 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.66 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.66 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.66 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.66 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.66 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.66 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.66 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 15:11:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.66 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.66 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.71 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.71 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.80 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 309565 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.13/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.80 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.80 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % SubtermCWHack with pid 309572 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.80 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.80 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.80 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.80
% 0.13/0.80 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.80 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.80 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.80 % Parsed axioms : 131
% 0.13/0.80 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Initial clauses : 295
% 0.13/0.80 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.13/0.80 % Initial clauses in saturation : 293
% 0.13/0.80 % Processed clauses : 248
% 0.13/0.80 % ...of these trivial : 17
% 0.13/0.80 % ...subsumed : 51
% 0.13/0.80 % ...remaining for further processing : 180
% 0.13/0.80 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 125
% 0.13/0.80 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.13/0.80 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.13/0.80 % Generated clauses : 171
% 0.13/0.80 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 159
% 0.13/0.80 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.13/0.80 % Paramodulations : 95
% 0.13/0.80 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Equation resolutions : 128
% 0.13/0.80 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Total rewrite steps : 63
% 0.13/0.80 % ...of those cached : 51
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.80 % Current number of processed clauses : 105
% 0.13/0.80 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.13/0.80 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.80 % Non-unit-clauses : 86
% 0.13/0.80 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 194
% 0.13/0.80 % ...number of literals in the above : 2921
% 0.13/0.80 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.13/0.80 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4973
% 0.13/0.80 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1128
% 0.13/0.80 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 45
% 0.13/0.80 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.13/0.80 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.13/0.80 % BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.13/0.80 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.80 % Termbank termtop insertions : 47667
% 0.13/0.80 % Search garbage collected termcells : 14086
% 0.13/0.80
% 0.13/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.80 % User time : 0.056 s
% 0.13/0.80 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.80 % Total time : 0.062 s
% 0.13/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 6224 pages
% 0.13/0.80
% 0.13/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.80 % User time : 0.133 s
% 0.13/0.80 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.13/0.80 % Total time : 0.163 s
% 0.13/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.13/0.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------