%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : GEO298+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:20:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.02s 6.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 63 ( 36 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 289 ( 108 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 32 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 360 ( 134 ~; 133 |; 88 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 16 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 94 ( 0 sgn 40 !; 21 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(91), 0), imp(cond(axiom(91), 0)))',axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
( ( X4 = X5
& ron(X3,X4)
& ron(X2,X4)
& ron(X1,X4)
& rline(X5)
& X2 != X3
& X1 != X3
& X1 != X2
& ? [X6] :
( X3 = X6
& rpoint(X6) )
& ? [X7] :
( X2 = X7
& rpoint(X7) )
& ? [X8] :
( X1 = X8
& rpoint(X8) ) )
=> ( rR(X2,X1,X3)
| rR(X1,X2,X3)
| rR(X3,X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(91), 0), imp(cond(axiom(91), 0)))') ).
fof('and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))',axiom,
( ~ ? [X10] :
( ron(vd1187,X10)
& ron(vd1186,X10)
& ron(vd1185,X10)
& rline(X10) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& ? [X11] :
( vd1187 = X11
& rpoint(X11) )
& ? [X12] :
( vd1186 = X12
& rpoint(X12) )
& ? [X13] :
( vd1185 = X13
& rpoint(X13) )
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& ? [X14] :
( vd1180 = X14
& rpoint(X14) )
& ? [X15] :
( vd1179 = X15
& rpoint(X15) )
& ? [X16] :
( vd1178 = X16
& rpoint(X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))') ).
fof('qe(s3(plural(271)))',axiom,
? [X9] :
( vd1201 = X9
& rpoint(X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qe(s3(plural(271)))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(81), 0), imp(cond(axiom(81), 0)))',axiom,
! [X276,X277,X278] :
( ( rR(X277,X276,X278)
& ? [X279] :
( X278 = X279
& rpoint(X279) )
& ? [X280] :
( X277 = X280
& rpoint(X280) )
& ? [X281] :
( X276 = X281
& rpoint(X281) ) )
=> ( ~ rR(X276,X277,X278)
& X276 != X278
& X276 != X277
& rR(X277,X278,X276) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(81), 0), imp(cond(axiom(81), 0)))') ).
fof('pred(s3(plural(315)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s3(plural(315)), 0)') ).
fof('pred(293, 0)',axiom,
rline(vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(293, 0)') ).
fof('pred(s2(plural(315)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1201,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s2(plural(315)), 0)') ).
fof('holds(320, 1251, 0)',axiom,
vd1201 != vd1187,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(320, 1251, 0)') ).
fof('dis(321)',conjecture,
( rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187)
| rR(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','dis(321)') ).
fof('pred(s1(plural(315)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s1(plural(315)), 0)') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))',axiom,
! [X74,X75,X76,X77] :
( ( rS(X74,X75,X76)
& X76 = X77
& rline(X77)
& ? [X78] :
( X75 = X78
& rpoint(X78) )
& ? [X79] :
( X74 = X79
& rpoint(X79) ) )
=> ~ ron(X74,X76) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))') ).
fof('neg(neg(319))',axiom,
~ rR(vd1185,vd1201,vd1187),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','neg(neg(319))') ).
fof('neg(neg(270))',axiom,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','neg(neg(270))') ).
fof('holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)',axiom,
rS(vd1201,vd1187,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)') ).
fof('pred(269, 0)',axiom,
rline(vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(269, 0)') ).
fof('pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)',axiom,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)') ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1539,X1540,X1541,X1542,X1543,X1544,X1545,X1546] :
( X1542 != X1543
| ~ ron(X1541,X1542)
| ~ ron(X1540,X1542)
| ~ ron(X1539,X1542)
| ~ rline(X1543)
| X1540 = X1541
| X1539 = X1541
| X1539 = X1540
| X1541 != X1544
| ~ rpoint(X1544)
| X1540 != X1545
| ~ rpoint(X1545)
| X1539 != X1546
| ~ rpoint(X1546)
| rR(X1540,X1539,X1541)
| rR(X1539,X1540,X1541)
| rR(X1541,X1539,X1540) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(91), 0), imp(cond(axiom(91), 0)))'])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1548] :
( ( ~ ron(vd1187,X1548)
| ~ ron(vd1186,X1548)
| ~ ron(vd1185,X1548)
| ~ rline(X1548) )
& vangle(vd1179,vd1178,vd1180) = vangle(vd1186,vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1180) = vf(vd1185,vd1187)
& vf(vd1178,vd1179) = vf(vd1185,vd1186)
& vd1187 = esk2_0
& rpoint(esk2_0)
& vd1186 = esk3_0
& rpoint(esk3_0)
& vd1185 = esk4_0
& rpoint(esk4_0)
& vd1179 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1180
& vd1178 != vd1179
& vd1180 = esk5_0
& rpoint(esk5_0)
& vd1179 = esk6_0
& rpoint(esk6_0)
& vd1178 = esk7_0
& rpoint(esk7_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['and(neg(neg(conjunct2(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))))), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))))), 1194, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(conjunct2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), 1193, 0), and(holds(conjunct1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268))), 1192, 0), and(qe(s3(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s2(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(qe(s1(plural(comma_conjunct2(268)))), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 9), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 8), and(pred(comma_conjunct1(268), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(268))), and(qe(s2(plural(268))), qe(s1(plural(268)))))))))))))))'])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X4 = X3
| X5 = X3
| X5 = X4
| rR(X4,X5,X3)
| rR(X5,X4,X3)
| rR(X3,X5,X4)
| X1 != X2
| ~ ron(X3,X1)
| ~ ron(X4,X1)
| ~ ron(X5,X1)
| ~ rline(X2)
| X3 != X6
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| X4 != X7
| ~ rpoint(X7)
| X5 != X8
| ~ rpoint(X8) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
rpoint(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
vd1187 = esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
( vd1201 = esk1_0
& rpoint(esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qe(s3(plural(271)))'])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X276,X277,X278] :
( ( rR(X277,X276,X278)
& ? [X279] :
( X278 = X279
& rpoint(X279) )
& ? [X280] :
( X277 = X280
& rpoint(X280) )
& ? [X281] :
( X276 = X281
& rpoint(X281) ) )
=> ( ~ rR(X276,X277,X278)
& X276 != X278
& X276 != X277
& rR(X277,X278,X276) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(81), 0), imp(cond(axiom(81), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = X2
| X3 = X2
| X3 = X1
| rR(X2,X1,X3)
| rR(X1,X2,X3)
| rR(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rline(X4)
| ~ ron(X2,X4)
| ~ ron(X1,X4)
| ~ ron(X3,X4) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
ron(vd1187,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s3(plural(315)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
rpoint(vd1187),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
rline(vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(293, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
vd1201 = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X1844,X1845,X1846,X1847,X1848,X1849] :
( ( ~ rR(X1844,X1845,X1846)
| ~ rR(X1845,X1844,X1846)
| X1846 != X1847
| ~ rpoint(X1847)
| X1845 != X1848
| ~ rpoint(X1848)
| X1844 != X1849
| ~ rpoint(X1849) )
& ( X1844 != X1846
| ~ rR(X1845,X1844,X1846)
| X1846 != X1847
| ~ rpoint(X1847)
| X1845 != X1848
| ~ rpoint(X1848)
| X1844 != X1849
| ~ rpoint(X1849) )
& ( X1844 != X1845
| ~ rR(X1845,X1844,X1846)
| X1846 != X1847
| ~ rpoint(X1847)
| X1845 != X1848
| ~ rpoint(X1848)
| X1844 != X1849
| ~ rpoint(X1849) )
& ( rR(X1845,X1846,X1844)
| ~ rR(X1845,X1844,X1846)
| X1846 != X1847
| ~ rpoint(X1847)
| X1845 != X1848
| ~ rpoint(X1848)
| X1844 != X1849
| ~ rpoint(X1849) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = vd1187
| X2 = vd1187
| X2 = X1
| rR(vd1187,X1,X2)
| rR(X1,vd1187,X2)
| rR(X2,vd1187,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1232)
| ~ ron(X2,vd1232) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
ron(vd1201,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s2(plural(315)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
rpoint(vd1201),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
vd1201 != vd1187,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(320, 1251, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
rpoint(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
vd1185 = esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ ( rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187)
| rR(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['dis(321)']) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( rR(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rR(X1,X3,X2)
| X2 != X4
| ~ rpoint(X4)
| X1 != X5
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X3 != X6
| ~ rpoint(X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( X1 = vd1201
| X1 = vd1187
| rR(X1,vd1187,vd1201)
| rR(vd1201,vd1187,X1)
| rR(vd1187,vd1201,X1)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ ron(X1,vd1232) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1232),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s1(plural(315)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
rpoint(vd1185),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
fof(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187)
& ~ rR(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
fof(c_0_42,plain,
! [X74,X75,X76,X77] :
( ( rS(X74,X75,X76)
& X76 = X77
& rline(X77)
& ? [X78] :
( X75 = X78
& rpoint(X78) )
& ? [X79] :
( X74 = X79
& rpoint(X79) ) )
=> ~ ron(X74,X76) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(99), 0), imp(cond(axiom(99), 0)))']) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( rR(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rR(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( vd1187 = vd1185
| vd1201 = vd1185
| rR(vd1187,vd1201,vd1185)
| rR(vd1201,vd1187,vd1185)
| rR(vd1185,vd1187,vd1201) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
~ rR(vd1187,vd1185,vd1201),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
fof(c_0_46,plain,
! [X1628,X1629,X1630,X1631,X1632,X1633] :
( ~ rS(X1628,X1629,X1630)
| X1630 != X1631
| ~ rline(X1631)
| X1629 != X1632
| ~ rpoint(X1632)
| X1628 != X1633
| ~ rpoint(X1633)
| ~ ron(X1628,X1630) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( vd1201 = vd1185
| vd1187 = vd1185
| rR(vd1185,vd1187,vd1201)
| rR(vd1201,vd1187,vd1185) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_32]),c_0_25]),c_0_40])]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
~ rR(vd1201,vd1185,vd1187),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
fof(c_0_49,plain,
~ rR(vd1185,vd1201,vd1187),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['neg(neg(319))']) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ rS(X1,X2,X3)
| X3 != X4
| ~ rline(X4)
| X2 != X5
| ~ rpoint(X5)
| X1 != X6
| ~ rpoint(X6)
| ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).
fof(c_0_51,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['neg(neg(270))']) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( vd1187 = vd1185
| vd1201 = vd1185
| rR(vd1185,vd1187,vd1201) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_47]),c_0_25]),c_0_32]),c_0_40])]),c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
~ rR(vd1185,vd1201,vd1187),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ rS(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rline(X3)
| ~ ron(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_50])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
rS(vd1201,vd1187,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(comma_conjunct2(comma_conjunct2(plural(271))), 1214, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
rline(vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(269, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
~ ron(vd1187,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( vd1201 = vd1185
| vd1187 = vd1185 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_52]),c_0_25]),c_0_40]),c_0_32])]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
ron(vd1185,vd1197),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s3(plural(274)), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
~ ron(vd1201,vd1197),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_32]),c_0_25]),c_0_56])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
vd1201 = vd1185,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_59])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO298+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 4 17:52:47 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.33 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 9.02/6.69 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 9.02/6.69 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 9.02/6.69 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.02/6.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.12/6.71 % Total time : 5.424s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------