↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO305+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:20:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.81s 1.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  40   ~;  32   |;  31   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  13   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qu(cond(axiom(83), 0), imp(cond(axiom(83), 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( X7 = X8
        & ron(X5,X7)
        & ron(X4,X7)
        & rR(X5,X4,X6)
        & rline(X8)
        & ? [X9] :
            ( X6 = X9
            & rpoint(X9) )
        & ? [X10] :
            ( X5 = X10
            & rpoint(X10) )
        & ? [X11] :
            ( X4 = X11
            & rpoint(X11) ) )
     => ron(X6,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(axiom(83), 0), imp(cond(axiom(83), 0)))') ).

fof('and(holds(conjunct2(345), 1294, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(345))), and(qe(s2(plural(345))), qe(s1(plural(345)))))))))',axiom,
    ( vf(vd1287,vd1288) = vf(vd1287,vd1289)
    & vd1288 != vd1289
    & vd1287 != vd1289
    & vd1287 != vd1288
    & ? [X1] :
        ( vd1289 = X1
        & rpoint(X1) )
    & ? [X2] :
        ( vd1288 = X2
        & rpoint(X2) )
    & ? [X3] :
        ( vd1287 = X3
        & rpoint(X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(holds(conjunct2(345), 1294, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(345))), and(qe(s2(plural(345))), qe(s1(plural(345)))))))))') ).

fof('and(pred(conjunct2(348), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(348), 1304, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(348), 1), holds(conjunct1(348), 1301, 0))))',axiom,
    ( vd1302 = vd1303
    & rR(vd1289,vd1287,vd1302)
    & rpoint(vd1303)
    & rR(vd1288,vd1287,vd1299) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','and(pred(conjunct2(348), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(348), 1304, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(348), 1), holds(conjunct1(348), 1301, 0))))') ).

fof('pred(conjunct2(349), 0)',conjecture,
    ron(vd1302,vd1297),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(conjunct2(349), 0)') ).

fof('pred(347, 0)',axiom,
    rline(vd1297),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(347, 0)') ).

fof('pred(s1(plural(347)), 0)',axiom,
    ron(vd1287,vd1297),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s1(plural(347)), 0)') ).

fof('pred(s2(plural(347)), 0)',axiom,
    ron(vd1289,vd1297),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','pred(s2(plural(347)), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1580,X1581,X1582,X1583,X1584,X1585,X1586,X1587] :
      ( X1583 != X1584
      | ~ ron(X1581,X1583)
      | ~ ron(X1580,X1583)
      | ~ rR(X1581,X1580,X1582)
      | ~ rline(X1584)
      | X1582 != X1585
      | ~ rpoint(X1585)
      | X1581 != X1586
      | ~ rpoint(X1586)
      | X1580 != X1587
      | ~ rpoint(X1587)
      | ron(X1582,X1583) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(83), 0), imp(cond(axiom(83), 0)))'])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ( vf(vd1287,vd1288) = vf(vd1287,vd1289)
    & vd1288 != vd1289
    & vd1287 != vd1289
    & vd1287 != vd1288
    & vd1289 = esk1_0
    & rpoint(esk1_0)
    & vd1288 = esk2_0
    & rpoint(esk2_0)
    & vd1287 = esk3_0
    & rpoint(esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['and(holds(conjunct2(345), 1294, 0), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(345), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(345))), and(qe(s2(plural(345))), qe(s1(plural(345)))))))))'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ron(X5,X1)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ ron(X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X4,X1)
    | ~ rR(X3,X4,X5)
    | ~ rline(X2)
    | X5 != X6
    | ~ rpoint(X6)
    | X3 != X7
    | ~ rpoint(X7)
    | X4 != X8
    | ~ rpoint(X8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    rpoint(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vd1287 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    rpoint(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    vd1289 = esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    rpoint(vd1303),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(348), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(348), 1304, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(348), 1), holds(conjunct1(348), 1301, 0))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    vd1302 = vd1303,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(348), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(348), 1304, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(348), 1), holds(conjunct1(348), 1301, 0))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ron(X1,X2)
    | ~ rline(X2)
    | ~ rpoint(X3)
    | ~ rpoint(X4)
    | ~ rpoint(X1)
    | ~ rR(X4,X3,X1)
    | ~ ron(X3,X2)
    | ~ ron(X4,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rR(vd1289,vd1287,vd1302),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(348), 4), and(holds(conjunct2(348), 1304, 0), and(pred(conjunct2(348), 1), holds(conjunct1(348), 1301, 0))))']) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rpoint(vd1287),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rpoint(vd1289),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    rpoint(vd1302),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ron(vd1302,vd1297),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['pred(conjunct2(349), 0)'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ron(vd1302,X1)
    | ~ rline(X1)
    | ~ ron(vd1287,X1)
    | ~ ron(vd1289,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rline(vd1297),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(347, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ron(vd1287,vd1297),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s1(plural(347)), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ron(vd1289,vd1297),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['pred(s2(plural(347)), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ron(vd1302,vd1297),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO305+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:52:44 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.81/1.89  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.81/1.89  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.81/1.89  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.81/1.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.91/1.90  % Total time : 1.424s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------