%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO342+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 109 ( 43 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 53 ~; 48 |; 36 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 0 sgn 7 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qe(thee(the(408), 1))',conjecture,
? [X1] :
( ron(vd1399,X1)
& ron(vd1401,X1)
& rline(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qe(thee(the(408), 1))') ).
fof('and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))',axiom,
( vd1406 = vd1407
& ron(vd1400,vd1406)
& ron(vd1399,vd1406)
& rline(vd1407)
& vd1400 != vd1401
& vd1399 != vd1401
& vd1399 != vd1400
& ? [X2] :
( vd1401 = X2
& rpoint(X2) )
& ? [X3] :
( vd1400 = X3
& rpoint(X3) )
& ? [X4] :
( vd1399 = X4
& rpoint(X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))') ).
fof('qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))',axiom,
! [X123,X124] :
( ( X123 != X124
& ? [X125] :
( X124 = X125
& rpoint(X125) )
& ? [X126] :
( X123 = X126
& rpoint(X126) ) )
=> ? [X127] :
( ron(X124,X127)
& ron(X123,X127)
& rline(X127) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))') ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( ron(vd1399,X1)
& ron(vd1401,X1)
& rline(X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qe(thee(the(408), 1))']) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ ron(vd1399,X2)
| ~ ron(vd1401,X2)
| ~ rline(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( vd1406 = vd1407
& ron(vd1400,vd1406)
& ron(vd1399,vd1406)
& rline(vd1407)
& vd1400 != vd1401
& vd1399 != vd1401
& vd1399 != vd1400
& vd1401 = esk1_0
& rpoint(esk1_0)
& vd1400 = esk2_0
& rpoint(esk2_0)
& vd1399 = esk3_0
& rpoint(esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))'])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X128,X129,X130,X131] :
( ( ron(X129,esk8_2(X128,X129))
| X128 = X129
| X129 != X130
| ~ rpoint(X130)
| X128 != X131
| ~ rpoint(X131) )
& ( ron(X128,esk8_2(X128,X129))
| X128 = X129
| X129 != X130
| ~ rpoint(X130)
| X128 != X131
| ~ rpoint(X131) )
& ( rline(esk8_2(X128,X129))
| X128 = X129
| X129 != X130
| ~ rpoint(X130)
| X128 != X131
| ~ rpoint(X131) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(51), 0), imp(cond(axiom(51), 0)))'])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(vd1401,X1)
| ~ ron(vd1399,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
vd1399 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
vd1401 = esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ron(X4,esk8_2(X2,X4))
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rline(X1)
| ~ ron(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ ron(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ron(X2,esk8_2(X1,X2))
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
rpoint(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ron(X2,esk8_2(X2,X4))
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
vd1399 != vd1401,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk3_0
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| ~ rline(esk8_2(X1,esk3_0))
| ~ ron(esk1_0,esk8_2(X1,esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ron(X1,esk8_2(X1,X2))
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
rpoint(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
esk3_0 != esk1_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( X2 = X4
| rline(esk8_2(X2,X4))
| ~ rpoint(X1)
| X2 != X1
| ~ rpoint(X3)
| X4 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ rline(esk8_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_13])]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = X2
| rline(esk8_2(X1,X2))
| ~ rpoint(X2)
| ~ rpoint(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_13]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO342+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:01:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.074 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 24
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 17
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 20
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 124
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 291
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 289
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 401
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 400
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1197
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 392
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 376
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 125
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1206
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 139
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 103
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 228
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 2347
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40718
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1409
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 115
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 61965
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.126 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.132 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 5824 pages
% 0.24/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------