%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:28:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_36ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_53ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ line(X2)
| ~ line(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ point(X2)
| ~ point(X1)
| line(line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X2,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_37]),c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X4,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
| ~ line(X3)
| ~ point(X2)
| ~ point(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| distinct_lines(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X2,X3)
| distinct_points(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ line(X2)
| ~ point(X1)
| line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ line(X1)
| line(reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
~ divides_points(X1,X2,X3),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_37]),c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_37]),c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,reverse_line(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 15:33:08 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3148108 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3148118 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses : 71
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 0.14/0.45 % Processed clauses : 70
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...subsumed : 38
% 0.14/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 32
% 0.14/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Generated clauses : 11
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.14/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.14/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34
% 0.14/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.14/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 0.14/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4809
% 0.14/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 726
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3936 pages
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------