%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:30:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_39ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_55ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ line(X2)
| ~ line(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ line(X2)
| ~ point(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X3,X2,X4)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2)
| before_on_line(X1,X4,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| distinct_lines(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X2,X3)
| distinct_points(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| between_on_line(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ before_on_line(X1,X2,X3)
| between_on_line(X1,X4,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
| ~ point(X2)
| ~ point(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X2,X3)
| before_on_line(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_25]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( ~ before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ line(X1)
| line(reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
~ divides_points(X1,X2,X3),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,reverse_line(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO354+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 15:32:39 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3063480 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 3063493 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses : 71
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 0.14/0.43 % Processed clauses : 94
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...subsumed : 38
% 0.14/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 0.14/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 32
% 0.14/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90
% 0.14/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.14/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 0.14/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4886
% 0.14/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 726
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3936 pages
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.022 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------