↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO494+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:06:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 4.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  129 (  60   ~;  57   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  182 (  23 sgn 104   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aSatz5_5b,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17,X18] :
      ( le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
      | ~ s_t(X12,X15,X18)
      | ~ s_e(X12,X18,X14,X17) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz5_5b) ).

fof(aSatz5_5a,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17] :
      ( ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | s_t(X12,X15,ins(X14,X17,X12,X15)) )
      & ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | s_e(X12,ins(X14,X17,X12,X15),X14,X17) )
      & ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | ins(X14,X17,X12,X15) = ext(X12,X15,insert(X12,X15,X14,X17),X17) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz5_5a) ).

fof(aSatz3_6b,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17] :
      ( ~ s_t(X12,X15,X14)
      | ~ s_t(X12,X14,X17)
      | s_t(X12,X15,X17) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz3_6b) ).

fof(aSatz5_8,conjecture,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17,X18,X19] :
      ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
      | ~ le(X14,X17,X18,X19)
      | le(X12,X15,X18,X19) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz5_8) ).

fof(aSatz5_6,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17,X20,X21,X22,X26] :
      ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
      | ~ s_e(X12,X15,X20,X21)
      | ~ s_e(X14,X17,X22,X26)
      | le(X20,X21,X22,X26) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz5_6) ).

fof(aA4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X7,X4] :
      ( s_t(X1,X2,ext(X1,X2,X7,X4))
      & s_e(X2,ext(X1,X2,X7,X4),X7,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO011+0.ax',aA4) ).

fof(d_Defn5_4,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X14,X17,X2] :
      ( ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | s_t(X14,insert(X12,X15,X14,X17),X17) )
      & ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | s_e(X12,X15,X14,insert(X12,X15,X14,X17)) )
      & ( ~ s_t(X14,X2,X17)
        | ~ s_e(X12,X15,X14,X2)
        | le(X12,X15,X14,X17) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d_Defn5_4) ).

fof(d_insert,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15,X20,X22] : insert(X12,X15,X20,X22) = ext(ext(X22,X20,alpha,gamma),X20,X12,X15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d_insert) ).

fof(aSatz2_1,axiom,
    ! [X12,X15] : s_e(X12,X15,X12,X15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',aSatz2_1) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21,X22,X23] :
      ( le(X19,X20,X21,X22)
      | ~ s_t(X19,X20,X23)
      | ~ s_e(X19,X23,X21,X22) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[aSatz5_5b])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21,X18,X19,X20,X21,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ le(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | s_t(X18,X19,ins(X20,X21,X18,X19)) )
      & ( ~ le(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | s_e(X18,ins(X20,X21,X18,X19),X20,X21) )
      & ( ~ le(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | ins(X20,X21,X18,X19) = ext(X18,X19,insert(X18,X19,X20,X21),X21) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[aSatz5_5a])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ~ s_t(X18,X19,X20)
      | ~ s_t(X18,X20,X21)
      | s_t(X18,X19,X21) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[aSatz3_6b])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( le(X1,X5,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_e(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X5,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( s_e(X1,ins(X2,X3,X1,X4),X2,X3)
    | ~ le(X1,X4,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( s_t(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( s_t(X1,X2,ins(X3,X4,X1,X2))
    | ~ le(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X12,X15,X14,X17,X18,X19] :
        ( ~ le(X12,X15,X14,X17)
        | ~ le(X14,X17,X18,X19)
        | le(X12,X15,X18,X19) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz5_8]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ~ le(X27,X28,X29,X30)
      | ~ s_e(X27,X28,X31,X32)
      | ~ s_e(X29,X30,X33,X34)
      | le(X31,X32,X33,X34) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[aSatz5_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( s_t(X8,X9,ext(X8,X9,X10,X11))
      & s_e(X9,ext(X8,X9,X10,X11),X10,X11) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aA4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ le(X1,X5,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X2,ins(X3,X4,X1,X5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( s_t(X1,X2,ins(X3,X4,X1,X5))
    | ~ le(X1,X5,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X2,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( le(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & le(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0)
    & ~ le(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_e(X5,X6,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_e(X7,X8,X1,X2)
    | ~ le(X7,X8,X5,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    s_e(X1,ext(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ le(X1,X5,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(X1,X2,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    le(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21,X18,X19,X20,X21,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( ~ le(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | s_t(X20,insert(X18,X19,X20,X21),X21) )
      & ( ~ le(X18,X19,X20,X21)
        | s_e(X18,X19,X20,insert(X18,X19,X20,X21)) )
      & ( ~ s_t(X20,X22,X21)
        | ~ s_e(X18,X19,X20,X22)
        | le(X18,X19,X20,X21) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d_Defn5_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26] : insert(X23,X24,X25,X26) = ext(ext(X26,X25,alpha,gamma),X25,X23,X24),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d_insert]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ le(X5,ext(X6,X5,X1,X2),X7,X8)
    | ~ s_e(X7,X8,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( le(esk3_0,X1,esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ s_t(esk3_0,X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( s_t(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X4),X4)
    | ~ le(X2,X3,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    insert(X1,X2,X3,X4) = ext(ext(X4,X3,alpha,gamma),X3,X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ s_t(esk3_0,ext(X5,esk3_0,X1,X2),esk4_0)
    | ~ s_e(esk5_0,esk6_0,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( s_t(X1,ext(ext(X4,X1,alpha,gamma),X1,X2,X3),X4)
    | ~ le(X2,X3,X1,X4) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( le(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ le(X1,X2,esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ s_e(esk5_0,esk6_0,X3,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    le(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] : s_e(X16,X17,X16,X17),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aSatz2_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ le(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( le(esk1_0,esk2_0,X1,X2)
    | ~ s_e(esk5_0,esk6_0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    s_e(X1,X2,X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO494+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:59:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/4.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/4.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/4.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.25/4.44  
% 0.25/4.44  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.25/4.44  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.25/4.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 67
% 0.25/4.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 33
% 0.25/4.44  # Initial clauses                      : 36
% 0.25/4.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 36
% 0.25/4.44  # Processed clauses                    : 107
% 0.25/4.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # ...subsumed                          : 32
% 0.25/4.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 72
% 0.25/4.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # Generated clauses                    : 182
% 0.25/4.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 76
% 0.25/4.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.25/4.44  # Paramodulations                      : 182
% 0.25/4.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 69
% 0.25/4.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.25/4.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/4.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.25/4.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 52
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/4.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1444
% 0.25/4.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1144
% 0.25/4.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 36
% 0.25/4.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.25/4.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 88
% 0.25/4.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.25/4.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5164
% 0.25/4.44  
% 0.25/4.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/4.44  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.25/4.44  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.25/4.44  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.25/4.44  # Maximum resident set size: 3140 pages
% 0.25/4.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/4.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.25/4.44  
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof found!
% 0.25/4.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/4.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object total steps             : 41
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 22
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 19
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 11
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 8
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 0.25/4.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/4.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 67
% 0.25/4.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Initial clauses                      : 101
% 0.25/4.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.25/4.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 100
% 0.25/4.44  # Processed clauses                    : 16579
% 0.25/4.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 41
% 0.25/4.44  # ...subsumed                          : 12999
% 0.25/4.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3539
% 0.25/4.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 298
% 0.25/4.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.25/4.44  # Generated clauses                    : 139759
% 0.25/4.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 132425
% 0.25/4.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4655
% 0.25/4.44  # Paramodulations                      : 139757
% 0.25/4.44  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.25/4.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3239
% 0.25/4.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 53
% 0.25/4.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/4.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 105
% 0.25/4.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3081
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 110005
% 0.25/4.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 565066
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 301
% 0.25/4.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4870813
% 0.25/4.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1807821
% 0.25/4.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12515
% 0.25/4.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20785
% 0.25/4.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1985
% 0.25/4.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.25/4.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/4.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2562498
% 0.25/4.44  
% 0.25/4.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/4.44  # User time                : 3.154 s
% 0.25/4.44  # System time              : 0.067 s
% 0.25/4.44  # Total time               : 3.221 s
% 0.25/4.44  # Maximum resident set size: 110808 pages
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.55  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------