↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO497+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:21:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.15s 1.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (  29 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  172 (  58 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  151 (  72   ~;  62   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   3 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  143 (   0 sgn 135   !;   8   ?;  41   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X1,ext(X0,X1,X2,X3),X2,X3)
      & s_t(X0,X1,ext(X0,X1,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO011+0.ax',aA4) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_2) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_4) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_13) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( s_t(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz3_2) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : X0 != ext(X1,X0,alpha,gamma),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz3_14b) ).

fof(f71,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ s_t(X2,X1,X3)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X3)
      | X3 = X1
      | X2 = X1
      | X0 = X1
      | sameside(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz6_3b) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( sameside(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ sameside(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz6_6) ).

fof(f77,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( s_e(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X2,X3)
        | X2 = X3
        | X0 = X1 )
      & ( sameside(insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X1,X0)
        | X2 = X3
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz6_11a) ).

fof(f78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( s_e(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X2,X3)
          | X2 = X3
          | X0 = X1 )
        & ( sameside(insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X1,X0)
          | X2 = X3
          | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f77]) ).

fof(f79,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : insert(X0,X1,X2,X3) = ext(ext(X3,X2,alpha,gamma),X2,X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d_insert) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ s_e(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X2,X3)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 )
      | ( ~ sameside(insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X1,X0)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ( ~ sameside(insert(sK3,sK4,sK2,sK1),sK2,sK1)
      & sK3 != sK4
      & sK1 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2),skolemize(X2,sK3),skolemize(X3,sK4)],[f89]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : s_e(X1,ext(X0,X1,X2,X3),X2,X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : s_t(X0,X1,ext(X0,X1,X2,X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s_t(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ext(X1,X0,alpha,gamma) != X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ s_t(X2,X1,X3)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X3)
      | X1 = X3
      | X1 = X2
      | X0 = X1
      | sameside(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( sameside(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ sameside(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ~ sameside(insert(sK3,sK4,sK2,sK1),sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | sK3 != sK4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | sK1 != sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : insert(X0,X1,X2,X3) = ext(ext(X3,X2,alpha,gamma),X2,X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ~ sameside(ext(ext(sK1,sK2,alpha,gamma),sK2,sK3,sK4),sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f185,f188]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : s_t(X0,X1,ext(X0,X1,X2,X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : s_e(X0,ext(X1,X0,X2,X3),X2,X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( s_t(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ext(X0,X1,alpha,gamma) != X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).

tcf(c_131,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( sameside(X0,X1,X3)
      | ( X1 = X3 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ s_t(X3,X1,X2)
      | ~ s_t(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f175]) ).

tcf(c_136,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sameside(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ sameside(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f180]) ).

tcf(c_141,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ( sK1 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

tcf(c_142,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ( sK4 != sK3 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f186]) ).

tcf(c_143,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK3)
    | ~ sameside(ext(ext(sK1,sK2,alpha,gamma),sK2,sK3,sK4),sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f228]) ).

tcf(c_3104,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = ext(sK1,sK2,alpha,gamma),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_3105,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = ext(iPr_def_10,sK2,sK3,sK4),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_4338,plain,
    s_t(sK1,sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3104,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_4343,plain,
    s_t(iPr_def_10,sK2,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3105,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_4344,plain,
    sK2 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3104,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_4346,plain,
    s_e(sK2,iPr_def_11,sK3,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3105,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_4368,plain,
    s_t(iPr_def_11,sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4343,c_73]) ).

tcf(c_4656,plain,
    s_e(sK3,sK4,sK2,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4346,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_4675,plain,
    s_e(sK4,sK3,sK2,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4656,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_13755,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sameside(sK1,sK2,X0)
      | ( sK2 = iPr_def_10 )
      | ( sK1 = sK2 )
      | ( X0 = sK2 )
      | ~ s_t(X0,sK2,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4338,c_131]) ).

fof(f88,definition,
    ! [X1,X0,X3,X2] :
      ( ~ sP0(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ( ~ s_e(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X2,X3)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( sP0(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ( ~ sameside(insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X1,X0)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f87,f88]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X1,X0,X3,X2] :
      ( ~ sP0(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ( ~ s_e(X1,insert(X2,X3,X1,X0),X2,X3)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ( ~ s_e(X0,insert(X3,X2,X0,X1),X3,X2)
        & X2 != X3
        & X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,insert(X3,X2,X0,X1),X3,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,ext(ext(X1,X0,alpha,gamma),X0,X3,X2),X3,X2) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f182,f188]) ).

tcf(c_140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,ext(ext(X1,X0,alpha,gamma),X0,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f227]) ).

tcf(c_253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : ~ sP0(X0,X1,X2,X3),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_256,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_257,plain,
    sK4 != sK3,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_258,plain,
    ~ sameside(ext(ext(sK1,sK2,alpha,gamma),sK2,sK3,sK4),sK2,sK1),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_3106,plain,
    ~ sameside(iPr_def_11,sK2,sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_258,c_3104,c_3105]) ).

tcf(c_3107,plain,
    sK4 != sK3,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_257]) ).

tcf(c_3108,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_256]) ).

tcf(c_13801,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sameside(sK1,sK2,X0)
      | ( X0 = sK2 )
      | ~ s_t(X0,sK2,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_13755,c_4344,c_3108]) ).

tcf(c_14352,plain,
    ( sameside(sK1,sK2,iPr_def_11)
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4368,c_13801]) ).

tcf(c_16353,plain,
    ( sameside(iPr_def_11,sK2,sK1)
    | ( sK2 = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_14352,c_136]) ).

tcf(c_16358,plain,
    sK2 = iPr_def_11,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16353,c_3106]) ).

tcf(c_16480,plain,
    s_e(sK4,sK3,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_4675,c_16358]) ).

tcf(c_17060,plain,
    sK4 = sK3,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_16480,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_17061,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_17060,c_3107]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO497+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.42  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 12:13:02 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/0.48  % Proving...
% 7.15/1.78  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.15/1.78  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.15/1.78  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.15/1.78  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Parsing...
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Proving...
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % 
% 7.15/1.78  % clauses                               105
% 7.15/1.78  % conjectures                           0
% 7.15/1.78  % EPR                                   84
% 7.15/1.78  % Horn                                  86
% 7.15/1.78  % unary                                 25
% 7.15/1.78  % binary                                33
% 7.15/1.78  % lits                                  277
% 7.15/1.78  % lits eq                               37
% 7.15/1.78  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.15/1.78  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.15/1.78  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.15/1.78  % fd_pseudo_cond                        19
% 7.15/1.78  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ 
% 7.15/1.78  % Current options:
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % ------ Proving...
% 7.15/1.78  % 
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.15/1.78  
% 7.15/1.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.15/1.79  
% 7.15/1.79  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------