%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : GEO506+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:50:15 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 165.34s 110.87s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO506+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.0.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:18:22 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.54/0.59 ____ _ % 0.54/0.59 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.54/0.59 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.54/0.59 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.54/0.59 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.54/0.59 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.54/0.59 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.54/0.59 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.54/0.59 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.54/0.59 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.54/0.59 % 0.54/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.74/0.64 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 2.76/1.23 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 5.47/1.86 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.76/1.92 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.31/5.93 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 20.01/6.07 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 22.25/6.54 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 29.92/8.53 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 31.09/8.72 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 32.85/9.18 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 33.07/9.22 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 39.95/11.54 Prover 0: stopped % 40.39/11.74 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 41.13/11.88 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 41.13/11.95 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 41.45/11.96 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 86.31/52.67 Prover 3: stopped % 86.64/52.87 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete % 87.33/53.04 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 88.90/53.42 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 88.98/53.44 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 111.01/66.97 Prover 1: gave up % 111.01/66.97 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 111.48/67.06 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 112.39/67.30 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 124.53/75.85 Prover 5: stopped % 124.71/76.05 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 124.90/76.17 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 125.84/76.41 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 125.84/76.42 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 165.34/110.87 Prover 6: proved (20716ms) % 165.34/110.87 Prover 2: stopped % 165.34/110.87 Prover 4: stopped % 165.34/110.87 % 165.34/110.87 No countermodel exists, formula is valid % 165.34/110.87 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 165.34/110.87 % 165.34/110.87 Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers %------------------------------------------------------------------------------