↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:18:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 92.11s 12.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 92.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  44   ~;  40   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   0 sgn  41   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(aA1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : s_e(X,Y,Y,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aA1) ).

fof(aA2,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,V,Z2,V2] :
      ( s_e(Z,V,Z2,V2)
      | ~ s_e(X,Y,Z2,V2)
      | ~ s_e(X,Y,Z,V) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aA2) ).

fof(aSatz2_4,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xd] :
      ( s_e(Xb,Xa,Xc,Xd)
      | ~ s_e(Xa,Xb,Xc,Xd) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_4) ).

fof(aSatz2_14,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xd] :
      ( s_e(Xb,Xa,Xd,Xc)
      | ~ s_e(Xa,Xb,Xc,Xd) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_14) ).

fof(aSatz7_6,axiom,
    ! [Xp,Xa,Xq] :
      ( Xq = s(Xa,Xp)
      | ~ s_m(Xp,Xa,Xq) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz7_6) ).

fof(aSatz8_2,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc] :
      ( s_r(Xc,Xb,Xa)
      | ~ s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_2) ).

fof(aSatz8_4,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc] :
      ( s_r(Xa,Xb,s(Xb,Xc))
      | ~ s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_4) ).

fof(aSatz8_22,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb] : s_m(Xa,midpoint(Xa,Xb),Xb),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_22) ).

fof(aSatz10_12b,axiom,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xa1] :
      ( s_e(Xa,Xc,Xa1,Xc)
      | ~ s_e(Xa,Xb,Xa1,Xb)
      | ~ s_r(Xa1,Xb,Xc)
      | ~ s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_12b) ).

fof(aSatz10_12c,conjecture,
    ! [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xa1,Xc1] :
      ( Xc = Xc1
      | Xb != midpoint(Xc,Xc1)
      | s_e(Xa,Xc,Xa1,Xc1)
      | ~ s_e(Xb,Xc,Xb,Xc1)
      | ~ s_e(Xa,Xb,Xa1,Xb)
      | ~ s_r(Xa1,Xb,Xc1)
      | ~ s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_12c) ).

fof(aSatz10_12c_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xa1,Xc1] :
        ( Xc = Xc1
        | Xb != midpoint(Xc,Xc1)
        | s_e(Xa,Xc,Xa1,Xc1)
        | ~ s_e(Xb,Xc,Xb,Xc1)
        | ~ s_e(Xa,Xb,Xa1,Xb)
        | ~ s_r(Xa1,Xb,Xc1)
        | ~ s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz10_12c]) ).

cnf(c_340,plain,
    s_e(A,B,B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aA1]) ).

cnf(c_341,plain,
    ( s_e(C,D,E,F)
    | ~ s_e(A,B,E,F)
    | ~ s_e(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aA2]) ).

cnf(c_348,plain,
    ( s_e(B,A,C,D)
    | ~ s_e(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz2_4]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    ( s_e(B,A,D,C)
    | ~ s_e(A,B,C,D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz2_14]) ).

cnf(c_414,plain,
    ( s(B,A) = C
    | ~ s_m(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz7_6]) ).

cnf(c_431,plain,
    ( s_r(C,B,A)
    | ~ s_r(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz8_2]) ).

cnf(c_433,plain,
    ( s_r(A,B,s(B,C))
    | ~ s_r(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz8_4]) ).

cnf(c_452,plain,
    s_m(A,midpoint(A,B),B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz8_22]) ).

cnf(c_495,plain,
    ( s_e(A,C,D,C)
    | ~ s_e(A,B,D,B)
    | ~ s_r(D,B,C)
    | ~ s_r(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[aSatz10_12b]) ).

fof(nnf_206,plain,
    ? [Xa,Xb,Xc,Xa1,Xc1] :
      ( Xc1 != Xc
      & midpoint(Xc,Xc1) = Xb
      & ~ s_e(Xa,Xc,Xa1,Xc1)
      & s_e(Xb,Xc,Xb,Xc1)
      & s_e(Xa,Xb,Xa1,Xb)
      & s_r(Xa1,Xb,Xc1)
      & s_r(Xa,Xb,Xc) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

fof(sk_aSatz10_12c_neg,plain,
    ( sK4 != sK2
    & midpoint(sK2,sK4) = sK1
    & ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4)
    & s_e(sK1,sK2,sK1,sK4)
    & s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1)
    & s_r(sK3,sK1,sK4)
    & s_r(sK0,sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(Xa,sK0),skolemize(Xb,sK1),skolemize(Xc,sK2),skolemize(Xa1,sK3),skolemize(Xc1,sK4)],[nnf_206]) ).

cnf(c_505,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_506,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK3,sK1,sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_507,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_508,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK1,sK2,sK1,sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_509,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_510,negated_conjecture,
    midpoint(sK2,sK4) = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_aSatz10_12c_neg]) ).

cnf(c_13898,negated_conjecture,
    ( s_e(sK1,sK4,A,B)
    | ~ s_e(sK1,sK2,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_341,c_508]) ).

cnf(c_958,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK1,sK4,sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13898,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_1331,plain,
    s_e(sK4,sK1,sK2,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_958,c_348]) ).

cnf(c_4624,plain,
    s_r(sK2,sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_505]) ).

cnf(c_4931,plain,
    s_m(sK2,sK1,sK4),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_510,c_452]) ).

cnf(c_4935,plain,
    s(sK1,sK2) = sK4,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4931,c_414]) ).

cnf(c_13899,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,s(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_433,c_505]) ).

cnf(c_5670,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,sK4),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4935,c_13899]) ).

cnf(c_5677,plain,
    s_r(sK4,sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5670,c_431]) ).

cnf(c_13900,plain,
    ( s_e(sK4,sK0,A,sK0)
    | ~ s_e(sK4,sK1,A,sK1)
    | ~ s_r(A,sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_495,c_5677]) ).

cnf(c_13901,plain,
    ( s_e(sK4,sK0,sK2,sK0)
    | ~ s_e(sK4,sK1,sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13900,c_4624]) ).

cnf(c_12383,plain,
    s_e(sK4,sK0,sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13901,c_1331]) ).

cnf(c_13902,plain,
    ( s_e(sK0,sK4,A,sK4)
    | ~ s_e(sK0,sK1,A,sK1)
    | ~ s_r(A,sK1,sK4) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_495,c_5670]) ).

cnf(c_13903,negated_conjecture,
    ( s_e(sK0,sK4,sK3,sK4)
    | ~ s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13902,c_506]) ).

cnf(c_12385,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK0,sK4,sK3,sK4),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13903,c_507]) ).

cnf(c_12404,plain,
    s_e(sK0,sK4,sK0,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12383,c_353]) ).

cnf(c_13904,plain,
    ( s_e(sK0,sK2,A,B)
    | ~ s_e(sK0,sK4,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_341,c_12404]) ).

cnf(c_13905,plain,
    s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13904,c_12385]) ).

cnf(c_13897,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_509,c_13905]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:43:44 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 2494567 was started by sandbox2 on n016,
% 0.09/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 13:43:44 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.39  
% 0.09/0.39  % SInE: 161 to sos, 48 to usable, of 209 axioms (tolerance 2.00, depth 0 fixpoint).
% 92.11/12.58  
% 92.11/12.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 92.11/12.58  
% 92.11/12.58  % Proof 1 at 3.38 (+ 0.71) seconds.
% 92.11/12.58  % Length of proof is 36.
% 92.11/12.58  % Level of proof is 8.
% 92.11/12.58  % Maximum clause weight is 113.000.
% 92.11/12.58  % Given clauses 419.
% 92.11/12.58  
% 92.11/12.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------