↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:21:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 116.65s 20.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 116.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  131 (  62   ~;  57   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  109 (   0 sgn 104   !;   5   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_2) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( s_e(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_3) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz2_14) ).

fof(f98,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = s(X1,X0)
      | ~ s_m(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz7_6) ).

fof(f118,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( s_r(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_2) ).

fof(f120,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( s_r(X0,X1,s(X1,X2))
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_4) ).

fof(f146,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : s_m(X0,midpoint(X0,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz8_22) ).

fof(f194,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( s_e(X0,X2,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X3,X1)
      | ~ s_r(X3,X1,X2)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_12b) ).

fof(f195,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( X2 = X4
      | X1 != midpoint(X2,X4)
      | s_e(X0,X2,X3,X4)
      | ~ s_e(X1,X2,X1,X4)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X3,X1)
      | ~ s_r(X3,X1,X4)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz10_12c) ).

fof(f196,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( X2 = X4
        | X1 != midpoint(X2,X4)
        | s_e(X0,X2,X3,X4)
        | ~ s_e(X1,X2,X1,X4)
        | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X3,X1)
        | ~ s_r(X3,X1,X4)
        | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f195]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( X2 != X4
      & midpoint(X2,X4) = X1
      & ~ s_e(X0,X2,X3,X4)
      & s_e(X1,X2,X1,X4)
      & s_e(X0,X1,X3,X1)
      & s_r(X3,X1,X4)
      & s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK4
    & sK1 = midpoint(sK2,sK4)
    & ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4)
    & s_e(sK1,sK2,sK1,sK4)
    & s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1)
    & s_r(sK3,sK1,sK4)
    & s_r(sK0,sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4)],[f212]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    sK1 = midpoint(sK2,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    s_e(sK1,sK2,sK1,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    s_r(sK3,sK1,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f220,plain,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f234,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f240,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( s_e(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f241,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( s_e(X0,X2,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X3,X1)
      | ~ s_r(X3,X1,X2)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f260,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s_r(X0,X1,s(X1,X2))
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s_r(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : s_m(X0,midpoint(X0,X1),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f146]) ).

fof(f313,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( s(X1,X0) = X2
      | ~ s_m(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f220]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    s_r(sK3,sK1,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK0,sK1,sK3,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f218]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    s_e(sK1,sK2,sK1,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f217]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f216]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    midpoint(sK2,sK4) = sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( s_e(X1,X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f234]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( s_e(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f240]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( s_e(X2,X3,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f241]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( s_e(X0,X3,X2,X3)
      | ~ s_r(X2,X1,X3)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f249]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( s_r(X0,X1,s(X1,X2))
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f260]) ).

tcf(c_97,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( s_r(X2,X1,X0)
      | ~ s_r(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f262]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : s_m(X0,midpoint(X0,X1),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( s(X1,X0) = X2 )
      | ~ s_m(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f313]) ).

tcf(c_5784,plain,
    s_m(sK2,sK1,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_6351,plain,
    s(sK1,sK2) = sK4,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5784,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_6388,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s_r(X0,sK1,sK4)
      | ~ s_r(X0,sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6351,c_95]) ).

tcf(c_6665,plain,
    s_r(sK0,sK1,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_6388]) ).

tcf(c_6668,plain,
    s_r(sK4,sK1,sK0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6665,c_97]) ).

tcf(c_145223,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4)
      | ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,X0,X1)
      | ~ s_e(X0,X1,sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).

tcf(c_148287,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4)
      | ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,X0,sK4)
      | ~ s_e(X0,sK4,sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_145223]) ).

tcf(c_150613,plain,
    s_r(sK2,sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_151035,plain,
    s_e(sK2,sK1,sK4,sK1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_151770,plain,
    s_e(sK3,sK1,sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_161919,plain,
    ( s_e(sK0,sK2,sK3,sK4)
    | ~ s_e(sK0,sK4,sK3,sK4)
    | ~ s_e(sK0,sK2,sK0,sK4) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_148287]) ).

tcf(c_245547,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s_e(sK3,sK4,X0,sK4)
      | ~ s_r(X0,sK1,sK4)
      | ~ s_e(sK3,sK1,X0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_245551,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s_e(sK2,sK0,X0,sK0)
      | ~ s_r(X0,sK1,sK0)
      | ~ s_e(sK2,sK1,X0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_150613]) ).

tcf(c_253699,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s_e(X0,sK4,sK3,sK4)
      | ~ s_r(X0,sK1,sK4)
      | ~ s_e(sK3,sK1,X0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_245547,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_254304,plain,
    ( s_e(sK2,sK0,sK4,sK0)
    | ~ s_r(sK4,sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_245551,c_151035]) ).

tcf(c_254975,plain,
    s_e(sK2,sK0,sK4,sK0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_254304,c_6668,c_254304]) ).

tcf(c_254981,plain,
    s_e(sK0,sK2,sK0,sK4),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_254975,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_267369,plain,
    ( s_e(sK0,sK4,sK3,sK4)
    | ~ s_r(sK0,sK1,sK4) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_253699,c_151770]) ).

tcf(c_267370,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_267369,c_254981,c_161919,c_6665,c_53]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO526+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 12:21:08 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.42  % Proving...
% 116.65/20.49  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 116.65/20.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------  iProver source info
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 116.65/20.49  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 116.65/20.49  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Parsing...
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 18 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Proving...
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % 
% 116.65/20.49  % clauses                               138
% 116.65/20.49  % conjectures                           7
% 116.65/20.49  % EPR                                   107
% 116.65/20.49  % Horn                                  97
% 116.65/20.49  % unary                                 23
% 116.65/20.49  % binary                                47
% 116.65/20.49  % lits                                  420
% 116.65/20.49  % lits eq                               94
% 116.65/20.49  % fd_pure                               0
% 116.65/20.49  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 116.65/20.49  % fd_cond                               0
% 116.65/20.49  % fd_pseudo_cond                        51
% 116.65/20.49  % AC symbols                            0
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ 
% 116.65/20.49  % Current options:
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Proving...
% 116.65/20.49  % Proof_search_loop: time out after: 3464 full_loop iterations
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Input Options"1. --res_lit_sel adaptive --res_lit_sel_side num_symb" Time Limit: 15.
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ 
% 116.65/20.49  % Current options:
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % ------ Proving...
% 116.65/20.49  % 
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 116.65/20.49  
% 116.65/20.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------