↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO547+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:20:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.61s 5.78s
% Output   : Refutation 5.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : GEO547+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:38:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36  Sat Jun 18 03:38:42 2022
% 0.19/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6339.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 167 during input processing: 0 [copy,167,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36  167 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.36  167 back subsumes 145.
% 0.19/0.36  167 back subsumes 144.
% 0.19/0.36  167 back subsumes 143.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.42  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.42  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.42  number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.19/0.42  number of clauses initially in problem: 163
% 0.19/0.42  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.19/0.42  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.19/0.42  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.42  absolute distinct symbol count: 41
% 0.19/0.42     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.42     distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.42     distinct constant count: 9
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  =========== start of search ===========
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 5.61/5.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.61/5.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   5.41 sec ----> 4767 [binary,4766.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  Length of proof is 18.  Level of proof is 6.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 5.61/5.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.61/5.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 5.61/5.78  2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 5.61/5.78  3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 5.61/5.78  113 [] {+} -coll($c4,$c3,$c2).
% 5.61/5.78  114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 5.61/5.78  162 [] {-} coll($c4,$c8,$c7).
% 5.61/5.78  164 [] {-} coll($c3,$c9,$c7).
% 5.61/5.78  166 [] {-} coll($c2,$c9,$c8).
% 5.61/5.78  187 [hyper,162,1] {-} coll($c4,$c7,$c8).
% 5.61/5.78  202 [hyper,164,1] {-} coll($c3,$c7,$c9).
% 5.61/5.78  215 [hyper,166,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c2).
% 5.61/5.78  216 [hyper,166,2] {-} coll($c9,$c2,$c8).
% 5.61/5.78  217 [hyper,166,1] {-} coll($c2,$c8,$c9).
% 5.61/5.78  275 [hyper,187,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c4).
% 5.61/5.78  337 [hyper,202,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c3).
% 5.61/5.78  365 [hyper,216,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c9).
% 5.61/5.78  397 [hyper,217,114] {-} coll($c9,$c9,$c2).
% 5.61/5.78  487 [hyper,275,3,215] {-} coll($c4,$c2,$c8).
% 5.61/5.78  886 [hyper,365,3,275] {-} coll($c4,$c9,$c8).
% 5.61/5.78  916 [hyper,397,3,337] {-} coll($c2,$c3,$c9).
% 5.61/5.78  1355 [hyper,487,1] {-} coll($c4,$c8,$c2).
% 5.61/5.78  2063 [hyper,886,1] {-} coll($c4,$c8,$c9).
% 5.61/5.78  2198 [hyper,916,1] {-} coll($c2,$c9,$c3).
% 5.61/5.78  3479 [hyper,2063,3,1355] {-} coll($c2,$c9,$c4).
% 5.61/5.78  4766 [hyper,3479,3,2198] {-} coll($c4,$c3,$c2).
% 5.61/5.78  4767 [binary,4766.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.61/5.78  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  ============ end of search ============
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 5.61/5.78  
% 5.61/5.78  Process 6339 finished Sat Jun 18 03:38:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------