↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO583+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.98s 23.16s
% Output   : Refutation 22.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GEO583+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:53:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Sat Jun 18 00:53:44 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12106.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 168 during input processing: 0 [copy,168,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  168 back subsumes 146.
% 0.13/0.37  168 back subsumes 145.
% 0.13/0.37  168 back subsumes 144.
% 0.13/0.37  168 back subsumes 143.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.44  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.44  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.44  number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.19/0.44  number of clauses initially in problem: 164
% 0.19/0.44  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 93
% 0.19/0.44  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.19/0.44  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.44  absolute distinct symbol count: 43
% 0.19/0.44     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.19/0.44     distinct function count: 20
% 0.19/0.44     distinct constant count: 11
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  =========== start of search ===========
% 4.91/5.16  
% 4.91/5.16  
% 4.91/5.16  Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 4.91/5.16  
% 4.91/5.16  Resetting weight limit to 57 after 220 givens.
% 4.91/5.16  
% 5.44/5.66  
% 5.44/5.66  
% 5.44/5.66  Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 5.44/5.66  
% 5.44/5.66  Resetting weight limit to 56 after 225 givens.
% 5.44/5.66  
% 7.02/7.22  
% 7.02/7.22  
% 7.02/7.22  Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 7.02/7.22  
% 7.02/7.22  Resetting weight limit to 55 after 240 givens.
% 7.02/7.22  
% 8.16/8.40  
% 8.16/8.40  
% 8.16/8.40  Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 8.16/8.40  
% 8.16/8.40  Resetting weight limit to 52 after 250 givens.
% 8.16/8.40  
% 9.19/9.42  
% 9.19/9.42  
% 9.19/9.42  Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 9.19/9.42  
% 9.19/9.42  Resetting weight limit to 51 after 255 givens.
% 9.19/9.42  
% 11.26/11.49  
% 11.26/11.49  
% 11.26/11.49  Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 11.26/11.49  
% 11.26/11.49  Resetting weight limit to 50 after 275 givens.
% 11.26/11.49  
% 12.91/13.11  
% 12.91/13.11  
% 12.91/13.11  Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 12.91/13.11  
% 12.91/13.11  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 12.91/13.11  
% 12.91/13.11  
% 12.91/13.11  Resetting weight limit to 49 after 305 givens.
% 12.91/13.11  
% 13.13/13.36  
% 13.13/13.36  
% 13.13/13.36  Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 13.13/13.36  
% 13.13/13.36  Resetting weight limit to 47 after 310 givens.
% 13.13/13.36  
% 13.35/13.58  
% 13.35/13.58  
% 13.35/13.58  Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 13.35/13.58  
% 13.35/13.58  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 315 givens.
% 13.35/13.58  
% 14.12/14.34  
% 14.12/14.34  
% 14.12/14.34  Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 14.12/14.34  
% 14.12/14.34  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 330 givens.
% 14.12/14.34  
% 14.42/14.60  
% 14.42/14.60  
% 14.42/14.60  Changing weight limit from 45 to 37.
% 14.42/14.60  
% 14.42/14.60  Resetting weight limit to 37 after 335 givens.
% 14.42/14.60  
% 14.88/15.09  
% 14.88/15.09  
% 14.88/15.09  Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 14.88/15.09  
% 14.88/15.09  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 345 givens.
% 14.88/15.09  
% 15.10/15.36  
% 15.10/15.36  
% 15.10/15.36  Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 15.10/15.36  
% 15.10/15.36  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 350 givens.
% 15.10/15.36  
% 15.70/15.91  
% 15.70/15.91  
% 15.70/15.91  Changing weight limit from 35 to 31.
% 15.70/15.91  
% 15.70/15.91  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 360 givens.
% 15.70/15.91  
% 15.85/16.08  
% 15.85/16.08  
% 15.85/16.08  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 15.85/16.08  
% 15.85/16.08  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 365 givens.
% 15.85/16.08  
% 19.20/19.41  
% 19.20/19.41  
% 19.20/19.41  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 19.20/19.41  
% 19.20/19.41  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 530 givens.
% 19.20/19.41  
% 20.50/20.72  
% 20.50/20.72  
% 20.50/20.72  Changing weight limit from 29 to 23.
% 20.50/20.72  
% 20.50/20.72  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 930 givens.
% 20.50/20.72  
% 20.61/20.81  
% 20.61/20.81  
% 20.61/20.81  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 20.61/20.81  
% 20.61/20.81  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 1000 givens.
% 20.61/20.81  
% 20.64/20.88  
% 20.64/20.88  
% 20.64/20.88  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 20.64/20.88  
% 20.64/20.88  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 1030 givens.
% 20.64/20.88  
% 20.72/20.94  
% 20.72/20.94  
% 20.72/20.94  Changing weight limit from 21 to 18.
% 20.72/20.94  
% 20.72/20.94  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 1055 givens.
% 20.72/20.94  
% 20.72/20.96  
% 20.72/20.96  
% 20.72/20.96  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 20.72/20.96  
% 20.72/20.96  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 1105 givens.
% 20.72/20.96  
% 20.93/21.13  
% 20.93/21.13  
% 20.93/21.13  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 20.93/21.13  
% 20.93/21.13  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 1255 givens.
% 20.93/21.13  
% 21.18/21.36  
% 21.18/21.36  
% 21.18/21.36  Changing weight limit from 16 to 13.
% 21.18/21.36  
% 21.18/21.36  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 1270 givens.
% 21.18/21.36  
% 21.22/21.43  
% 21.22/21.43  
% 21.22/21.43  Changing weight limit from 13 to 10.
% 21.22/21.43  
% 21.22/21.43  Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1275 givens.
% 21.22/21.43  
% 22.83/23.02  
% 22.83/23.02  
% 22.83/23.02  Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 22.83/23.02  
% 22.83/23.02  Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1700 givens.
% 22.83/23.02  
% 22.98/23.16  
% 22.98/23.16  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 22.98/23.16  
% 22.98/23.16  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  22.72 sec ----> 56168 [binary,56167.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.98/23.16  
% 22.98/23.16  Length of proof is 39.  Level of proof is 9.
% 22.98/23.16  
% 22.98/23.16  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 22.98/23.16  % SZS status Theorem
% 22.98/23.16  % SZS output start Refutation
% 22.98/23.16  
% 22.98/23.16  1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 22.98/23.16  2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 22.98/23.16  3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 22.98/23.16  6 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -para(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 22.98/23.16  8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 22.98/23.16  9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 22.98/23.16  10 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|perp(A,B,E,F).
% 22.98/23.16  11 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|midp(A,C,B).
% 22.98/23.16  23 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(A,B,D,C).
% 22.98/23.16  24 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)|cong(C,D,A,B).
% 22.98/23.16  25 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,D)| -cong(C,D,E,F)|cong(A,B,E,F).
% 22.98/23.16  45 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -midp(D,B,E)|para(A,D,C,E).
% 22.98/23.16  57 [] {+} -cong(A,B,C,B)| -cong(A,D,C,D)|perp(A,C,B,D).
% 22.98/23.16  65 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,E)| -para(B,E,C,D)|midp(A,D,E).
% 22.98/23.16  68 [] {+} -cong(A,B,A,C)| -coll(A,B,C)|midp(A,B,C).
% 22.98/23.16  69 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|cong(A,B,A,C).
% 22.98/23.16  70 [] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|coll(A,B,C).
% 22.98/23.16  99 [] {+} -circle(A,B,C,D)|perp($f12(B,C,D,A),B,B,A).
% 22.98/23.16  113 [] {+} -perp($c5,$c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.16  114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 22.98/23.16  124 [factor,45.1.2] {+} -midp(A,B,C)|para(A,A,C,C).
% 22.98/23.16  129 [factor,65.2.3] {+} -midp(A,B,C)| -para(B,D,C,D)|midp(A,D,D).
% 22.98/23.16  159 [] {-} circle($c8,$c11,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.16  161 [] {-} midp($c6,$c9,$c10).
% 22.98/23.16  162 [] {-} midp($c5,$c11,$c7).
% 22.98/23.16  163 [] {-} midp($c4,$c5,$c6).
% 22.98/23.16  164 [] {-} coll($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 22.98/23.16  165 [] {-} cong($c8,$c4,$c8,$c3).
% 22.98/23.16  169 [hyper,159,99] {-} perp($f12($c11,$c10,$c9,$c8),$c11,$c11,$c8).
% 22.98/23.16  193 [hyper,161,69] {-} cong($c6,$c9,$c6,$c10).
% 22.98/23.16  194 [hyper,161,11] {-} midp($c6,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.16  221 [hyper,162,70] {-} coll($c5,$c11,$c7).
% 22.98/23.16  222 [hyper,162,69] {-} cong($c5,$c11,$c5,$c7).
% 22.98/23.16  223 [hyper,162,11] {-} midp($c5,$c7,$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  241 [hyper,163,124] {-} para($c4,$c4,$c6,$c6).
% 22.98/23.16  290 [hyper,164,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c8).
% 22.98/23.16  352 [hyper,165,68,164] {-} midp($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 22.98/23.16  355 [hyper,165,23] {-} cong($c8,$c4,$c3,$c8).
% 22.98/23.16  402 [hyper,194,69] {-} cong($c6,$c10,$c6,$c9).
% 22.98/23.16  420 [hyper,221,1] {-} coll($c5,$c7,$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  471 [hyper,223,69] {-} cong($c5,$c7,$c5,$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  506 [hyper,169,8] {-} perp($c11,$c8,$f12($c11,$c10,$c9,$c8),$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  601 [hyper,290,114] {-} coll($c8,$c8,$c3).
% 22.98/23.16  1125 [hyper,352,11] {-} midp($c8,$c3,$c4).
% 22.98/23.16  1267 [hyper,420,114] {-} coll($c11,$c11,$c5).
% 22.98/23.16  1405 [hyper,601,1] {-} coll($c8,$c3,$c8).
% 22.98/23.16  2160 [hyper,1125,124] {-} para($c8,$c8,$c4,$c4).
% 22.98/23.16  2359 [hyper,1267,1] {-} coll($c11,$c5,$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  2556 [hyper,1405,2] {-} coll($c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.98/23.16  3946 [hyper,2359,2] {-} coll($c5,$c11,$c11).
% 22.98/23.16  11999 [hyper,355,24] {-} cong($c3,$c8,$c8,$c4).
% 22.98/23.16  14884 [hyper,402,25,193] {-} cong($c6,$c9,$c6,$c9).
% 22.98/23.17  14885 [hyper,402,25,193] {-} cong($c6,$c10,$c6,$c10).
% 22.98/23.17  18168 [hyper,471,25,222] {-} cong($c5,$c11,$c5,$c11).
% 22.98/23.17  18545 [hyper,506,9,169] {-} para($c11,$c8,$c11,$c8).
% 22.98/23.17  20765 [hyper,2160,6,241] {-} para($c8,$c8,$c6,$c6).
% 22.98/23.17  23458 [hyper,11999,25,355] {-} cong($c3,$c8,$c3,$c8).
% 22.98/23.17  24810 [hyper,14885,57,14884] {-} perp($c6,$c6,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.17  27202 [hyper,18168,68,3946] {-} midp($c5,$c11,$c11).
% 22.98/23.17  27763 [hyper,18545,129,27202] {-} midp($c5,$c8,$c8).
% 22.98/23.17  37247 [hyper,23458,68,2556] {-} midp($c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.98/23.17  37319 [hyper,37247,45,27763] {-} para($c5,$c3,$c8,$c8).
% 22.98/23.17  39337 [hyper,24810,10,20765] {-} perp($c8,$c8,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.17  56167 [hyper,39337,10,37319] {-} perp($c5,$c3,$c10,$c9).
% 22.98/23.17  56168 [binary,56167.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  % SZS output end Refutation
% 22.98/23.17  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  ============ end of search ============
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 22.98/23.17  
% 22.98/23.17  Process 12106 finished Sat Jun 18 00:54:06 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------