%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO624+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 52.08s 52.27s
% Output : Refutation 52.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO624+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:09:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Fri Jun 17 22:09:42 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22882.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -eqangle(A,B,C,D,C,D,A,B)|perp(A,B,C,D)|para(A,B,C,D).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 171 during input processing: 0 [copy,171,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36 171 back subsumes 146.
% 0.12/0.36 171 back subsumes 145.
% 0.12/0.36 171 back subsumes 144.
% 0.12/0.36 171 back subsumes 143.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 154
% 0.18/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 167
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.18/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.18/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 42
% 0.18/0.43 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.18/0.43 distinct function count: 20
% 0.18/0.43 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.60/6.78
% 6.60/6.78
% 6.60/6.78 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 6.60/6.78
% 6.60/6.78 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 240 givens.
% 6.60/6.78
% 7.51/7.74
% 7.51/7.74
% 7.51/7.74 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 7.51/7.74
% 7.51/7.74 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 245 givens.
% 7.51/7.74
% 10.45/10.63
% 10.45/10.63
% 10.45/10.63 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 10.45/10.63
% 10.45/10.63 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 265 givens.
% 10.45/10.63
% 13.08/13.29
% 13.08/13.29
% 13.08/13.29 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 13.08/13.29
% 13.08/13.29 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 295 givens.
% 13.08/13.29
% 13.73/13.93
% 13.73/13.93
% 13.73/13.93 Changing weight limit from 54 to 52.
% 13.73/13.93
% 13.73/13.93 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 13.73/13.93
% 13.73/13.93
% 13.73/13.93 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 305 givens.
% 13.73/13.93
% 15.34/15.55
% 15.34/15.55
% 15.34/15.55 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 15.34/15.55
% 15.34/15.55 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 325 givens.
% 15.34/15.55
% 19.03/19.24
% 19.03/19.24
% 19.03/19.24 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 19.03/19.24
% 19.03/19.24 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 375 givens.
% 19.03/19.24
% 22.43/22.63
% 22.43/22.63
% 22.43/22.63 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 22.43/22.63
% 22.43/22.63 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 430 givens.
% 22.43/22.63
% 23.54/23.80
% 23.54/23.80
% 23.54/23.80 Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 23.54/23.80
% 23.54/23.80 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 450 givens.
% 23.54/23.80
% 23.83/24.07
% 23.83/24.07
% 23.83/24.07 Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 23.83/24.07
% 23.83/24.07 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 455 givens.
% 23.83/24.07
% 24.62/24.82
% 24.62/24.82
% 24.62/24.82 Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 24.62/24.82
% 24.62/24.82 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 465 givens.
% 24.62/24.82
% 25.13/25.39
% 25.13/25.39
% 25.13/25.39 Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 25.13/25.39
% 25.13/25.39 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 475 givens.
% 25.13/25.39
% 25.43/25.68
% 25.43/25.68
% 25.43/25.68 Changing weight limit from 44 to 30.
% 25.43/25.68
% 25.43/25.68 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 480 givens.
% 25.43/25.68
% 36.89/37.11
% 36.89/37.11
% 36.89/37.11 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 36.89/37.11
% 36.89/37.11 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 1005 givens.
% 36.89/37.11
% 39.51/39.71
% 39.51/39.71
% 39.51/39.71 Changing weight limit from 29 to 10.
% 39.51/39.71
% 39.51/39.71 Resetting weight limit to 10 after 1285 givens.
% 39.51/39.71
% 41.35/41.58
% 41.35/41.58
% 41.35/41.58 Changing weight limit from 10 to 9.
% 41.35/41.58
% 41.35/41.58 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 1510 givens.
% 41.35/41.58
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 51.41 sec ----> 102775 [binary,102774.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 Length of proof is 36. Level of proof is 11.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 52.08/52.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 52.08/52.27 % SZS output start Refutation
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 1 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(A,C,B).
% 52.08/52.27 2 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(B,A,C).
% 52.08/52.27 3 [] {+} -coll(A,B,C)| -coll(A,B,D)|coll(C,D,A).
% 52.08/52.27 8 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)|perp(C,D,A,B).
% 52.08/52.27 9 [] {+} -perp(A,B,C,D)| -perp(C,D,E,F)|para(A,B,E,F).
% 52.08/52.27 14 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,B,D,C).
% 52.08/52.27 15 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)|cyclic(A,C,B,D).
% 52.08/52.27 17 [] {+} -cyclic(A,B,C,D)| -cyclic(A,B,C,E)|cyclic(B,C,D,E).
% 52.08/52.27 40 [] {+} -para(A,B,C,D)|eqangle(A,B,E,F,C,D,E,F).
% 52.08/52.27 43 [] {+} -eqangle(A,B,A,C,D,B,D,C)| -coll(A,D,C)|cyclic(B,C,A,D).
% 52.08/52.27 113 [] {+} -cyclic($c10,$c4,$c3,$c1).
% 52.08/52.27 114 [factor,3.1.2] {+} -coll(A,B,C)|coll(C,C,A).
% 52.08/52.27 159 [] {-} perp($c7,$c8,$c10,$c9).
% 52.08/52.27 160 [] {-} coll($c7,$c10,$c9).
% 52.08/52.27 162 [] {-} coll($c5,$c10,$c6).
% 52.08/52.27 163 [] {-} coll($c8,$c7,$c4).
% 52.08/52.27 165 [] {-} coll($c8,$c5,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 169 [] {-} coll($c1,$c10,$c9).
% 52.08/52.27 172 [hyper,159,8] {-} perp($c10,$c9,$c7,$c8).
% 52.08/52.27 191 [hyper,160,2] {-} coll($c10,$c7,$c9).
% 52.08/52.27 206 [hyper,162,2] {-} coll($c10,$c5,$c6).
% 52.08/52.27 221 [hyper,163,2] {-} coll($c7,$c8,$c4).
% 52.08/52.27 254 [hyper,165,2] {-} coll($c5,$c8,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 300 [hyper,169,1] {-} coll($c1,$c9,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 365 [hyper,191,1] {-} coll($c10,$c9,$c7).
% 52.08/52.27 429 [hyper,206,1] {-} coll($c10,$c6,$c5).
% 52.08/52.27 471 [hyper,172,9,159] {-} para($c10,$c9,$c10,$c9).
% 52.08/52.27 489 [hyper,221,114] {-} coll($c4,$c4,$c7).
% 52.08/52.27 531 [hyper,254,114] {-} coll($c3,$c3,$c5).
% 52.08/52.27 890 [hyper,300,114] {-} coll($c10,$c10,$c1).
% 52.08/52.27 1207 [hyper,365,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 1479 [hyper,429,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 1628 [hyper,489,114] {-} coll($c7,$c7,$c4).
% 52.08/52.27 1793 [hyper,531,114] {-} coll($c5,$c5,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 3435 [hyper,1628,3,1207] {-} coll($c4,$c10,$c7).
% 52.08/52.27 3744 [hyper,1793,3,1479] {-} coll($c3,$c10,$c5).
% 52.08/52.27 6397 [hyper,3435,1] {-} coll($c4,$c7,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 6702 [hyper,3744,1] {-} coll($c3,$c5,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 8633 [hyper,6397,114] {-} coll($c10,$c10,$c4).
% 52.08/52.27 9174 [hyper,6702,114] {-} coll($c10,$c10,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 14968 [hyper,471,40] {-} eqangle($c10,$c9,A,B,$c10,$c9,A,B).
% 52.08/52.27 46287 [hyper,14968,43,9174] {-} cyclic($c9,$c3,$c10,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 46288 [hyper,14968,43,8633] {-} cyclic($c9,$c4,$c10,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 46293 [hyper,14968,43,890] {-} cyclic($c9,$c1,$c10,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 65240 [hyper,46287,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c3,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 65243 [hyper,46288,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c4,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 65256 [hyper,46293,15] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c1,$c10).
% 52.08/52.27 87710 [hyper,65240,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c10,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 87722 [hyper,65243,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c10,$c4).
% 52.08/52.27 87760 [hyper,65256,14] {-} cyclic($c9,$c10,$c10,$c1).
% 52.08/52.27 96223 [hyper,87722,17,87710] {-} cyclic($c10,$c10,$c4,$c3).
% 52.08/52.27 96301 [hyper,87760,17,87722] {-} cyclic($c10,$c10,$c4,$c1).
% 52.08/52.27 102774 [hyper,96301,17,96223] {-} cyclic($c10,$c4,$c3,$c1).
% 52.08/52.27 102775 [binary,102774.1,113.1] {-} $F.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 % SZS output end Refutation
% 52.08/52.27 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 ============ end of search ============
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 52.08/52.27
% 52.08/52.27 Process 22882 finished Fri Jun 17 22:10:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------