%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO661+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:28:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_16ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_36ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ between(X3,X4,X6)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X5)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X7,X4,X8)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X7,X3,X8)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X5,X4,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X5,X7,X6,X8)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ between(X3,X6,X4)
| ~ between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X4,X2,X5)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X1)
| between(X1,esk9_6(X2,X3,X1,X4,X5,X6),X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ between(X3,X2,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X5,X1,X6)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X3,X1,X4)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X1,esk9_6(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X6,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X4,X6,X2)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X6,X4,X5)
| equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X2,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X3,X5,X4)
| between(X1,esk9_6(X2,X3,X1,X4,X4,X5),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X3,X1,X4)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ between(X3,X2,X5)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X1,esk9_6(X1,X3,X4,X5,X5,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X6,X2)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X4,X6,X4)
| ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X6,X2,X5)
| equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X4)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X4,X3)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X3,X4,X2)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X3,X2)
| equidistant(X3,X3,X2,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ between(X2,X1,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X4,X3)
| between(X1,esk9_6(X2,X1,X1,X3,X3,X4),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ between(X3,X2,X4)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X1,esk9_6(X1,X3,X3,X4,X4,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X5,X2,X5,X3)
| ~ equidistant(X4,X2,X4,X3)
| ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X3)
| between(X5,X1,X4)
| between(X4,X5,X1)
| between(X1,X4,X5)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X2,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| X1 = X2
| between(esk7_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X3,esk8_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ between(X5,X3,X2)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4)
| X1 = X3
| between(X1,X2,esk8_5(X1,X3,X4,X5,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ between(X2,X3,X5)
| ~ between(X1,X3,X4)
| X1 = X3
| between(X1,X2,esk7_5(X1,X3,X4,X2,X5)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,esk1_2(X1,X2))
| equidistant(X2,esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X2,X1,X3)
| between(X1,esk3_5(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ between(X5,X1,X4)
| ~ between(X2,X3,X4)
| between(X1,esk3_5(X2,X3,X4,X5,X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
~ between(esk6_0,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
~ between(esk5_0,esk6_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
~ between(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO661+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 18:16:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 653774 completed with status 1
% 0.10/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.10/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44 % partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 653790 completed with status 1
% 0.10/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44 % partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.44 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.10/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.10/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.10/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Initial clauses : 17
% 0.10/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.10/0.44 % Processed clauses : 52
% 0.10/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 0.10/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.10/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Generated clauses : 25
% 0.10/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.10/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Paramodulations : 25
% 0.10/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.10/0.44 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.10/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.10/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.10/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.10/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.10/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 454
% 0.10/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 243
% 0.10/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.10/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.10/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.10/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2370
% 0.10/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 414
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.10/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.10/0.44
% 0.10/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44 % User time : 0.036 s
% 0.10/0.44 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.44 % Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.10/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------