↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:22:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  22   ~;  20   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   9 sgn  39   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(maximal_path_length,conjecture,
    ( complete
   => ! [X4,X2,X3] :
        ( shortest_path(X2,X3,X4)
       => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(X4),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maximal_path_length) ).

fof(shortest_path_defn,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X10] :
      ( shortest_path(X2,X3,X10)
    <=> ( path(X2,X3,X10)
        & X2 != X3
        & ! [X4] :
            ( path(X2,X3,X4)
           => less_or_equal(length_of(X10),length_of(X4)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRA001+0.ax',shortest_path_defn) ).

fof(triangles_and_sequential_pairs,lemma,
    ( complete
   => ! [X4,X2,X3] :
        ( shortest_path(X2,X3,X4)
       => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X4) = number_of_in(triangles,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',triangles_and_sequential_pairs) ).

fof(length_defn,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( path(X2,X3,X4)
     => length_of(X4) = number_of_in(edges,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',length_defn) ).

fof(path_length_sequential_pairs,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X4] :
      ( path(X2,X3,X4)
     => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X4) = minus(length_of(X4),n1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',path_length_sequential_pairs) ).

fof(graph_has_them_all,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12] : less_or_equal(number_of_in(X11,X12),number_of_in(X11,graph)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',graph_has_them_all) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( complete
     => ! [X4,X2,X3] :
          ( shortest_path(X2,X3,X4)
         => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(X4),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[maximal_path_length]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X124,X125,X126,X127,X128,X129,X130] :
      ( ( path(X124,X125,X126)
        | ~ shortest_path(X124,X125,X126) )
      & ( X124 != X125
        | ~ shortest_path(X124,X125,X126) )
      & ( ~ path(X124,X125,X127)
        | less_or_equal(length_of(X126),length_of(X127))
        | ~ shortest_path(X124,X125,X126) )
      & ( path(X128,X129,esk6_3(X128,X129,X130))
        | ~ path(X128,X129,X130)
        | X128 = X129
        | shortest_path(X128,X129,X130) )
      & ( ~ less_or_equal(length_of(X130),length_of(esk6_3(X128,X129,X130)))
        | ~ path(X128,X129,X130)
        | X128 = X129
        | shortest_path(X128,X129,X130) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[shortest_path_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( complete
    & shortest_path(esk10_0,esk11_0,esk9_0)
    & ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(esk9_0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,lemma,
    ! [X155,X156,X157] :
      ( ~ complete
      | ~ shortest_path(X156,X157,X155)
      | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X155) = number_of_in(triangles,X155) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[triangles_and_sequential_pairs])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X141,X142,X143] :
      ( ~ path(X141,X142,X143)
      | length_of(X143) = number_of_in(edges,X143) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[length_defn])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( path(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    shortest_path(esk10_0,esk11_0,esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
    ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X3) = number_of_in(triangles,X3)
    | ~ complete
    | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    complete,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X144,X145,X146] :
      ( ~ path(X144,X145,X146)
      | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X146) = minus(length_of(X146),n1) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[path_length_sequential_pairs])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( length_of(X3) = number_of_in(edges,X3)
    | ~ path(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    path(esk10_0,esk11_0,esk9_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X153,X154] : less_or_equal(number_of_in(X153,X154),number_of_in(X153,graph)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[graph_has_them_all]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    ( number_of_in(triangles,X1) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X1)
    | ~ shortest_path(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X3) = minus(length_of(X3),n1)
    | ~ path(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    length_of(esk9_0) = number_of_in(edges,esk9_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    less_or_equal(number_of_in(X1,X2),number_of_in(X1,graph)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    number_of_in(triangles,esk9_0) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,esk9_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(esk9_0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    minus(number_of_in(edges,esk9_0),n1) = number_of_in(sequential_pairs,esk9_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(number_of_in(sequential_pairs,esk9_0),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 18:10:23 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.72  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------