↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:55:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.32s 0.94s
% Output   : Refutation 2.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  42   ~;  32   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (  71   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( path(X0,X1,X2)
        & X0 != X1
        & ! [X3] :
            ( path(X0,X1,X3)
           => less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',shortest_path_defn) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( path(X0,X1,X2)
     => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X2) = minus(length_of(X2),n1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',path_length_sequential_pairs) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : less_or_equal(number_of_in(X0,X1),number_of_in(X0,graph)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',graph_has_them_all) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ( complete
   => ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( shortest_path(X1,X2,X0)
       => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X0) = number_of_in(triangles,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',triangles_and_sequential_pairs) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ( complete
   => ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( shortest_path(X1,X2,X0)
       => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(X0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maximal_path_length) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( complete
     => ! [X0,X1,X2] :
          ( shortest_path(X1,X2,X0)
         => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(X0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X0) = number_of_in(triangles,X0)
        | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X0) )
    | ~ complete ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(X0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph))
        & shortest_path(X1,X2,X0) )
    & complete ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X2) = minus(length_of(X2),n1)
      | ~ path(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( path(X0,X1,X2)
        & X0 != X1
        & ! [X3] :
            ( less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
            | ~ path(X0,X1,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(sK0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph))
    & shortest_path(sK1,sK2,sK0)
    & complete ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f22]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
        | ~ path(X0,X1,X2)
        | X0 = X1
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ~ less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
            & path(X0,X1,X3) ) )
      & ( ( path(X0,X1,X2)
          & X0 != X1
          & ! [X3] :
              ( less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
              | ~ path(X0,X1,X3) ) )
        | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
        | ~ path(X0,X1,X2)
        | X0 = X1
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ~ less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
            & path(X0,X1,X3) ) )
      & ( ( path(X0,X1,X2)
          & X0 != X1
          & ! [X3] :
              ( less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
              | ~ path(X0,X1,X3) ) )
        | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
        | ~ path(X0,X1,X2)
        | X0 = X1
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ~ less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X3))
            & path(X0,X1,X3) ) )
      & ( ( path(X0,X1,X2)
          & X0 != X1
          & ! [X4] :
              ( less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X4))
              | ~ path(X0,X1,X4) ) )
        | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
        | ~ path(X0,X1,X2)
        | X0 = X1
        | ( ~ less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(sK4(X0,X1,X2)))
          & path(X0,X1,sK4(X0,X1,X2)) ) )
      & ( ( path(X0,X1,X2)
          & X0 != X1
          & ! [X4] :
              ( less_or_equal(length_of(X2),length_of(X4))
              | ~ path(X0,X1,X4) ) )
        | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(X3,sK4(X0,X1,X2))],[f35]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X0) = number_of_in(triangles,X0)
      | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X0)
      | ~ complete ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    complete,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    shortest_path(sK1,sK2,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(sK0),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X2) = minus(length_of(X2),n1)
      | ~ path(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( path(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : less_or_equal(number_of_in(X0,X1),number_of_in(X0,graph)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X0) = number_of_in(triangles,X0)
      | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f38]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( less_or_equal(number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X0),number_of_in(triangles,graph))
      | ~ shortest_path(X1,X2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f53,f58]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less_or_equal(number_of_in(sequential_pairs,sK0),number_of_in(triangles,graph))
      | ~ path(X0,X1,sK0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f40,f47]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ shortest_path(X2,X3,sK0)
      | ~ path(X0,X1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f63,f60]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ path(X0,X1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f66,f39]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f69,f50]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f70,f39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.32  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.32  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:20 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.32  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071413)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071423)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2419675867:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071420)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=499879389:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071421)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=2443244491:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=1266761309:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071418)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1201455470:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071419)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=457625413:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=3821728477:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)First to succeed.
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071421)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2071413"
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071423)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Instruction limit reached! 
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Time elapsed: 0.035 s
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071424)Instructions burned: 133 (million)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.32/0.94  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.32/0.94  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071422)------------------------------
% 2.32/0.94  % (2071413)Success in time 0.297 s
% 2.32/0.94  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------