↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 24 01:41:51 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 210.79s 26.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 210.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  12   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   5 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(maximal_path_length,plain,
    ( complete
   => ! [P,V1,V2] :
        ( shortest_path(V1,V2,P)
       => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(P),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maximal_path_length) ).

fof(maximal_path_length_negated,plain,
    ~ ( complete
     => ! [P,V1,V2] :
          ( shortest_path(V1,V2,P)
         => less_or_equal(minus(length_of(P),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[maximal_path_length]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    shortest_path(sK12,sK13,sK11),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[maximal_path_length_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    shortest_path(sK12,sK13,sK11),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

fof(shortest_path_defn,plain,
    ! [V1,V2,SP] :
      ( shortest_path(V1,V2,SP)
    <=> ( path(V1,V2,SP)
        & V1 != V2
        & ! [P] :
            ( path(V1,V2,P)
           => less_or_equal(length_of(SP),length_of(P)) ) ) ),
    file('Axioms/GRA001+0.ax',shortest_path_defn) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    ( ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
    | path(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[shortest_path_defn]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ shortest_path(sK12,sK13,sK11)
    | path(sK12,sK13,sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

fof(path_length_sequential_pairs,plain,
    ! [V1,V2,P] :
      ( path(V1,V2,P)
     => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P) = minus(length_of(P),n1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',path_length_sequential_pairs) ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ( ~ path(X0,X1,X2)
    | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X2) = minus(length_of(X2),n1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[path_length_sequential_pairs]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ path(sK12,sK13,sK11)
    | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,sK11) = minus(length_of(sK11),n1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

fof(triangles_and_sequential_pairs,plain,
    ( complete
   => ! [P,V1,V2] :
        ( shortest_path(V1,V2,P)
       => number_of_in(sequential_pairs,P) = number_of_in(triangles,P) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',triangles_and_sequential_pairs) ).

cnf(59,plain,
    ( ~ complete
    | ~ shortest_path(X0,X1,X2)
    | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,X2) = number_of_in(triangles,X2) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[triangles_and_sequential_pairs]) ).

cnf(l248,plain,
    ( ~ complete
    | ~ shortest_path(sK12,sK13,sK11)
    | number_of_in(sequential_pairs,sK11) = number_of_in(triangles,sK11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

fof(graph_has_them_all,plain,
    ! [Things,InThese] : less_or_equal(number_of_in(Things,InThese),number_of_in(Things,graph)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',graph_has_them_all) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    less_or_equal(number_of_in(X0,X1),number_of_in(X0,graph)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[graph_has_them_all]) ).

cnf(l262,plain,
    less_or_equal(number_of_in(triangles,sK11),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[58]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(sK11),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[maximal_path_length_negated]) ).

cnf(l1299,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(minus(length_of(sK11),n1),number_of_in(triangles,graph)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

cnf(60,plain,
    complete,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[maximal_path_length_negated]) ).

cnf(l2132,plain,
    complete,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l3,l248,l262,l1299,l2132]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRA002+4 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 20 13:07:19 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.19/0.44  % launching worker at depth: 11
% 6.61/1.17  % launching worker at depth: 12
% 210.79/26.84  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 210.79/26.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------