↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GRA005+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:19:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  16   ~;   6   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   2 sgn  15   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(shortest_path_properties,axiom,
    ! [V1,V2,E1,E2,P] :
      ( ( precedes(E1,E2,P)
        & shortest_path(V1,V2,P) )
     => ( ~ precedes(E2,E1,P)
        & ~ ? [E3] :
              ( head_of(E3) = head_of(E2)
              & tail_of(E3) = tail_of(E1) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',shortest_path_properties) ).

fof(no_short_cut_edge,conjecture,
    ! [V1,V2,E1,E2,P] :
      ( ( precedes(E1,E2,P)
        & shortest_path(V1,V2,P) )
     => ~ ? [E3] :
            ( head_of(E3) = head_of(E2)
            & tail_of(E3) = tail_of(E1)
            & edge(E3) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',no_short_cut_edge) ).

fof(no_short_cut_edge_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [V1,V2,E1,E2,P] :
        ( ( precedes(E1,E2,P)
          & shortest_path(V1,V2,P) )
       => ~ ? [E3] :
              ( head_of(E3) = head_of(E2)
              & tail_of(E3) = tail_of(E1)
              & edge(E3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[no_short_cut_edge]) ).

fof(nnf_18,plain,
    ? [V1,V2,E1,E2,P] :
      ( ? [E3] :
          ( head_of(E3) = head_of(E2)
          & tail_of(E3) = tail_of(E1)
          & edge(E3) )
      & precedes(E1,E2,P)
      & shortest_path(V1,V2,P) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[no_short_cut_edge_neg]) ).

fof(sk_no_short_cut_edge_neg,plain,
    ( head_of(sK5) = head_of(sK4)
    & tail_of(sK5) = tail_of(sK3)
    & edge(sK5)
    & precedes(sK3,sK4,sK2)
    & shortest_path(sK0,sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5]),skolemize(V1,sK0),skolemize(V2,sK1),skolemize(E1,sK3),skolemize(E2,sK4),skolemize(P,sK2),skolemize(E3,sK5)],[nnf_18]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    shortest_path(sK0,sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_no_short_cut_edge_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( head_of(F) != head_of(E)
    | tail_of(F) != tail_of(D)
    | ~ precedes(D,E,C)
    | ~ shortest_path(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[shortest_path_properties]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( head_of(C) != head_of(B)
    | tail_of(C) != tail_of(A)
    | ~ precedes(A,B,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    precedes(sK3,sK4,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_no_short_cut_edge_neg]) ).

cnf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
    tail_of(sK5) = tail_of(sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_no_short_cut_edge_neg]) ).

cnf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    head_of(sK5) = head_of(sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_no_short_cut_edge_neg]) ).

cnf(c_168,negated_conjecture,
    ( head_of(A) != head_of(sK4)
    | tail_of(A) != tail_of(sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
    head_of(sK5) != head_of(sK4),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_168,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_170,negated_conjecture,
    head_of(sK4) != head_of(sK4),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_169]) ).

cnf(c_167,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_170]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GRA005+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.56  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.56  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:48:14 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.56  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.56  % Process 1731583 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.12/0.56  % Fri Sep 25 13:48:14 2026
% 0.12/0.56  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.57  
% 0.12/0.57  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.60  
% 0.12/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.60  
% 0.12/0.60  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.60  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.12/0.60  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.12/0.60  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.12/0.60  % Given clauses 61.
% 0.12/0.60  
% 0.12/0.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------