↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.CSA-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GRA013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 07:22:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.21s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRA013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon May 30 22:53:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Completion found.
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.21/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.44  SPASS derived 91 clauses, backtracked 15 clauses, performed 7 splits and kept 100 clauses.
% 0.21/0.44  SPASS allocated 85138 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.21/0.44  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44   The saturated set of worked-off clauses is :
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% 0.21/0.44  7[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,w)* -> less_than(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.44  128[7:Res:34.0,116.0] || green(n4,n1)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  116[7:Res:112.0,10.0] || green(u,n5)+ green(u,n1)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  120[7:MRR:65.2,117.0] || red(u,n4)+ red(u,n1)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  121[7:MRR:99.1,117.0] || red(n2,n1)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  119[7:MRR:84.1,117.0] || red(n1,n2)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  117[7:Res:112.0,35.0] || green(n1,n4)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  114[7:MRR:58.1,111.0] || red(n1,n1)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  115[7:MRR:46.2,111.0] || red(u,n3)+ red(u,n1)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  111[7:Spt:110.0,106.0,107.0] || green(n1,n3)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  118[7:MRR:61.0,117.0] ||  -> red(n1,n4)*.
% 0.21/0.44  113[7:MRR:44.0,111.0] ||  -> red(n1,n3)*.
% 0.21/0.44  112[7:Spt:110.0,106.1] ||  -> green(n1,n5)*.
% 0.21/0.44  102[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,62.0,5.0] || less_than(n5,u)+ -> green(n1,u) red(n1,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  62[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,45.0,4.0] || less_than(n4,u)+ -> green(n1,u) red(n1,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  96[4:Res:73.0,63.0] || red(n3,n2)*+ -> green(n2,n5).
% 0.21/0.44  63[0:Res:59.1,11.0] || red(u,n5)+ red(u,n2)* -> green(n2,n5).
% 0.21/0.44  94[6:Res:90.0,91.0] || green(n1,n1)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  60[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,38.0,5.0] || less_than(n5,u)+ -> green(n2,u) red(n2,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  91[6:Res:90.0,10.0] || green(u,n2)+ green(u,n1)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  87[5:MRR:39.2,83.0] || red(u,n4)+ red(u,n2)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  90[6:Spt:88.0] ||  -> green(n1,n2)*.
% 0.21/0.44  86[5:MRR:56.1,83.0] || red(n2,n2)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  83[5:Spt:82.0,66.2,79.0] || green(n2,n4)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  85[5:MRR:37.0,83.0] ||  -> red(n2,n4)*.
% 0.21/0.44  75[4:MRR:32.2,71.0] || red(u,n5)+ red(u,n3)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  74[4:MRR:54.1,71.0] || red(n3,n3)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  71[4:Spt:70.0,64.2,67.0] || green(n3,n5)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  73[4:MRR:30.0,71.0] ||  -> red(n3,n5)*.
% 0.21/0.44  72[4:Spt:70.0,64.0,64.1] || red(n2,n3)*+ -> green(n2,n5).
% 0.21/0.44  59[0:Res:5.0,38.0] ||  -> green(n2,n5) red(n2,n5)*.
% 0.21/0.44  45[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,19.0,3.0] || less_than(n3,u)+ -> green(n1,u) red(n1,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  38[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,18.0,4.0] || less_than(n4,u)+ -> green(n2,u) red(n2,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  31[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,17.0,5.0] || less_than(n5,u)+ -> green(n3,u) red(n3,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  50[3:Res:48.0,49.0] || green(n2,n2)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  49[3:Res:48.0,10.0] || green(u,n3)+ green(u,n2)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  48[3:Spt:47.2] ||  -> green(n2,n3)*.
% 0.21/0.44  19[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,6.0,2.0] || less_than(n2,u)+ -> green(n1,u) red(n1,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  43[2:Res:41.0,42.0] || green(n3,n3)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  42[2:Res:41.0,10.0] || green(u,n4)+ green(u,n3)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  41[2:Spt:40.2] ||  -> green(n3,n4)*.
% 0.21/0.44  18[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,6.0,3.0] || less_than(n3,u)+ -> green(n2,u) red(n2,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  36[1:Res:34.0,35.0] || green(n4,n4)*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  35[1:Res:34.0,10.0] || green(u,n5)+ green(u,n4)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  34[1:Spt:33.2] ||  -> green(n4,n5)*.
% 0.21/0.44  17[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,6.0,4.0] || less_than(n4,u)+ -> green(n3,u) red(n3,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  16[0:NCh:7.2,7.0,6.0,5.0] || less_than(n5,u)+ -> green(n4,u) red(n4,u)*.
% 0.21/0.44  6[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v)+ -> green(u,v) red(u,v)*.
% 0.21/0.44  11[0:MRR:8.3,1.0] || red(u,v)*+ red(w,v)* red(w,u)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  10[0:MRR:9.3,1.0] || green(u,v)*+ green(w,v)* green(w,u)* -> .
% 0.21/0.44  2[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(n1,n2)*l.
% 0.21/0.44  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(n2,n3)*l.
% 0.21/0.44  4[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(n3,n4)*l.
% 0.21/0.44  5[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(n4,n5)*l.
% 0.21/0.44  1[0:Inp] || goal*+ -> .
% 0.21/0.44  % SZS output end Saturation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------