↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP002-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:37:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 1.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  37 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (  36 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(x_cubed_is_identity,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_cubed_is_identity) ).

cnf(prove_commutator,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_commutator) ).

cnf(commutator,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutator) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(inverse(X1))),X1) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_11]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    x_cubed_is_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),identity) = multiply(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_commutator]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    commutator ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,X1) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b)))),multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b)))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))) = inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))) = multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1))) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_28]),c_0_27]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_29]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_27]),c_0_32]),c_0_6]),c_0_24]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP002-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.95  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.95  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.95  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.95  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.95  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.95  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.95  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.95  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:56:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.95  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.95  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.99  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.99  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/1.02  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/1.02  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/1.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1562570 completed with status 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.10/1.02  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/1.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/1.02  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/1.02  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.10/1.02  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1562574 completed with status 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/1.02  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/1.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/1.02  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/1.02  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.10/1.02  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/1.02  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/1.02  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/1.02  
% 0.10/1.02  % Proof found!
% 0.10/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/1.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/1.02  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.10/1.02  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.10/1.02  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.10/1.02  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.10/1.02  % Processed clauses                    : 319
% 0.10/1.02  % ...of these trivial                  : 75
% 0.10/1.02  % ...subsumed                          : 191
% 0.10/1.02  % ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.10/1.02  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.10/1.02  % Generated clauses                    : 2078
% 0.10/1.02  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 963
% 0.10/1.02  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Paramodulations                      : 2078
% 0.10/1.02  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6231
% 0.10/1.02  % ...of those cached                   : 4970
% 0.10/1.02  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/1.02  % Current number of processed clauses  : 36
% 0.10/1.02  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.10/1.02  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.10/1.02  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.10/1.02  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 585
% 0.10/1.02  % ...number of literals in the above   : 585
% 0.10/1.02  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.10/1.02  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.10/1.02  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 187
% 0.10/1.02  % BW rewrite match successes           : 32
% 0.10/1.02  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/1.02  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 23183
% 0.10/1.02  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.10/1.02  
% 0.10/1.02  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/1.02  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.10/1.02  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.10/1.02  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.10/1.02  % Maximum resident set size: 3380 pages
% 0.10/1.02  
% 0.10/1.02  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/1.02  % User time                : 0.055 s
% 0.10/1.02  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.10/1.02  % Total time               : 0.070 s
% 0.10/1.02  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/1.02  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------