↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP002-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  42 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (  41 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(x_cubed_is_identity,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_cubed_is_identity) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(prove_commutator,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_commutator) ).

cnf(commutator,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutator) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    x_cubed_is_identity ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),identity) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_commutator]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    commutator ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_9]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    inverse(X1) = multiply(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b)))),multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b)))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(inverse(b),multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b))))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(inverse(X2),X3)) = multiply(inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X2))) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))) = multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2))) = multiply(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_28]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X1) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_20]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(b,a)),multiply(b,multiply(b,multiply(a,inverse(multiply(b,multiply(a,b))))))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_7]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_7]),c_0_23]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_25]),c_0_14]),c_0_25]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),multiply(X1,X3)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_23]),c_0_7]),c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRP002-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:53:41 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3372900 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 3372908 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.13/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 271
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 82
% 0.13/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 135
% 0.13/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 54
% 0.13/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.13/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 1733
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 657
% 0.13/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 1733
% 0.13/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5093
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 4001
% 0.13/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 46
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 32
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.13/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.13/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 354
% 0.13/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 354
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.13/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.13/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 256
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 26
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 19958
% 0.13/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.102 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.125 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------