↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GRP002-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:37:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  39 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (  38 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_commutator,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_commutator) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(right_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_inverse) ).

cnf(commutator,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutator) ).

cnf(right_identity,axiom,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_identity) ).

cnf(x_cubed_is_identity,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_cubed_is_identity) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_commutator]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    right_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    commutator(commutator(a,b),b) != identity,
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    commutator(X1,X2) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))),
    commutator ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    right_identity ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = identity,
    x_cubed_is_identity ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b)))),multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b)))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    inverse(X1) = multiply(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(inverse(b),multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(a),inverse(b))))),inverse(b))))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = multiply(X2,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(a,multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(b,multiply(b,multiply(inverse(multiply(a,multiply(b,inverse(multiply(b,a))))),multiply(b,b))))))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X3)))) = multiply(X3,inverse(multiply(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_18]),c_0_11]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2))) = multiply(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_27]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X1) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_20]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(a,multiply(a,multiply(b,multiply(a,inverse(multiply(b,multiply(a,b))))))))) != identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_25]),c_0_22]),c_0_25]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))))))) = identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_34]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : GRP002-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:58:42 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1259743 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 1259750 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Result found by G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.19/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/0.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Starting G-E--_201_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.19/0.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.19/0.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.19/0.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.19/0.49  % Processed clauses                    : 271
% 0.19/0.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 68
% 0.19/0.49  % ...subsumed                          : 147
% 0.19/0.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.19/0.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.19/0.49  % Generated clauses                    : 1857
% 0.19/0.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 675
% 0.19/0.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Paramodulations                      : 1857
% 0.19/0.49  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5625
% 0.19/0.49  % ...of those cached                   : 4463
% 0.19/0.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 0.19/0.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 33
% 0.19/0.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 0.19/0.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 377
% 0.19/0.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 377
% 0.19/0.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.19/0.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47
% 0.19/0.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 339
% 0.19/0.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.19/0.49  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 21532
% 0.19/0.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.19/0.49  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.19/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % User time                : 0.087 s
% 0.19/0.49  % System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.49  % Total time               : 0.105 s
% 0.19/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.19/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------