%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : GRP004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:51:44 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 3.39s 3.42s % Output : Proof 3.39s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GRP004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 09:31:53 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 3.39/3.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 3.39/3.42 % SZS output start Proof % 3.39/3.42 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 product(inverse(X), X, identity) % 3.39/3.42 product(identity, X, X) % 3.39/3.42 product(X, Y, U) & product(Y, Z, V) & product(U, Z, W) ==> product(X, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 product(X, Y, U) & product(Y, Z, V) & product(X, V, W) ==> product(U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 product(a, X, identity) ==> \bottom % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 This holds because % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 E: % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, X, V, W) = product(X, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 f2(true__, X, Y, U, V, W) = f1(product(X, Y, U), X, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 f3(product(U, Z, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = true__ % 3.39/3.42 f3(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = f2(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 f4(true__, U, Z, W) = product(U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f5(true__, X, Y, U, Z, W) = f4(product(X, Y, U), U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f6(product(X, V, W), Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = true__ % 3.39/3.42 f6(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) = f5(product(Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f7(product(a, X, identity)) = true__ % 3.39/3.42 f7(true__) = false__ % 3.39/3.42 product(identity, X, X) = true__ % 3.39/3.42 product(inverse(X), X, identity) = true__ % 3.39/3.42 G: % 3.39/3.42 true__ = false__ % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 This holds because % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, Y0, identity), Y3, identity, inverse(Y0)) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, identity, identity), Y3, Y2, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, identity, inverse(Y2)), Y3, Y2, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, inverse(Y1), identity), Y3, identity, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, inverse(Y1), inverse(Y1)), Y3, identity, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, inverse(identity), identity), Y3, Y2, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(f1(true__, Y3, inverse(inverse(Y2)), identity), Y3, Y2, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, Y1, identity, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, Y1, inverse(Y1), identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, identity, Y2, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, identity, inverse(inverse(identity)), identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(Y1), Y1, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(identity), Y1, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(inverse(Y1)), identity, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(inverse(identity)), Y1, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(inverse(inverse(Y1))), Y1, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(inverse(inverse(identity))), Y1, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f1(true__, inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y1)))), identity, Y1) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f2(f1(true__, Y3, Y1, Y4), Y5, Y3, inverse(Y1), Y4, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f2(f1(true__, Y3, Y2, Y4), Y5, Y3, identity, Y4, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f2(true__, X, Y, U, V, W) -> f1(f1(true__, X, Y, U), X, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 f3(f1(true__, Y0, Y1, Y2), Y3, Y1, Y4, Y5, Y0, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f3(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> f2(f1(true__, Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, identity, Y0, Y3), Y3, inverse(Y0), identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, identity, identity, Y3), Y3, Y2, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, identity, inverse(Y1), Y3), Y3, Y1, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, identity, inverse(identity), Y3), Y3, Y2, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, identity, inverse(inverse(Y2)), Y3), Y3, identity, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, inverse(Y2), identity, Y3), Y3, Y2, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(f1(true__, inverse(identity), inverse(Y1), Y3), Y3, Y1, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f4(true__, U, Z, W) -> f1(true__, U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f5(f1(true__, Y3, Y4, Y1), inverse(Y1), Y3, Y5, Y4, identity) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f5(f1(true__, Y3, Y4, Y2), identity, Y3, Y5, Y4, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f5(true__, X, Y, U, Z, W) -> f4(f1(true__, X, Y, U), U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f6(f1(true__, Y0, Y1, Y2), Y3, Y4, Y1, Y0, Y5, Y2) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f6(true__, Y, Z, V, X, U, W) -> f5(f1(true__, Y, Z, V), X, Y, U, Z, W) % 3.39/3.42 f7(f1(true__, a, Y0, identity)) -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 f7(true__) -> false__ % 3.39/3.42 false__ -> true__ % 3.39/3.42 product(X, V, W) -> f1(true__, X, V, W) % 3.39/3.42 with the LPO induced by % 3.39/3.42 f6 > f5 > f3 > f2 > f4 > product > f1 > a > inverse > f7 > identity > false__ > true__ % 3.39/3.42 % 3.39/3.42 % SZS output end Proof % 3.39/3.42 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------