%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : GRP004-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:41:20 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.35s 15.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity1,axiom,
( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X1,X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP005-0.ax',associativity1) ).
cnf(associativity2,axiom,
( ~ product(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X3,X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP005-0.ax',associativity2) ).
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
product(identity,X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP005-0.ax',left_identity) ).
cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
product(inverse(X1),X1,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP005-0.ax',left_inverse) ).
cnf(prove_right_inverse,negated_conjecture,
~ product(a,inverse(a),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_right_inverse) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X1,X5,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ product(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X3,X4,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ product(X3,X4,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X1,X5,X6) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
product(identity,X1,X1),
left_identity ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ product(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ product(X2,X4,X5)
| ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
| product(X3,X4,X6) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ product(X4,X3,X2)
| ~ product(X1,X4,identity)
| product(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
product(inverse(X1),X1,identity),
left_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
| ~ product(X4,identity,X1)
| product(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ product(X1,X3,X2)
| product(inverse(X1),X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ product(X4,X1,identity)
| ~ product(inverse(X4),X2,X3)
| product(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ product(a,inverse(a),identity),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_right_inverse]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ product(X2,X1,identity)
| product(X1,X2,identity) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ product(a,inverse(a),identity),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
product(X1,inverse(X1),identity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GRP004-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/15.43 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 19:52:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/15.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/15.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/15.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/15.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/15.52 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.35/15.52 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/15.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % sh5l with pid 3270659 completed with status 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.35/15.52 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/15.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.35/15.52 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.35/15.52 % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/15.52 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3270667 completed with status 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.35/15.52 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/15.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.35/15.52 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.35/15.52 % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/15.52 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/15.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.35/15.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.35/15.52
% 0.35/15.52 % Proof found!
% 0.35/15.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.35/15.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/15.52 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.35/15.52 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.35/15.52 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.35/15.52 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.35/15.52 % Processed clauses : 313
% 0.35/15.52 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.35/15.52 % ...subsumed : 177
% 0.35/15.52 % ...remaining for further processing : 135
% 0.35/15.52 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.35/15.52 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.35/15.52 % Generated clauses : 1166
% 0.35/15.52 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 751
% 0.35/15.52 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Paramodulations : 1166
% 0.35/15.52 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % NegExts : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Total rewrite steps : 709
% 0.35/15.52 % ...of those cached : 687
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/15.52 % Current number of processed clauses : 128
% 0.35/15.52 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.35/15.52 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Non-unit-clauses : 111
% 0.35/15.52 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 435
% 0.35/15.52 % ...number of literals in the above : 1300
% 0.35/15.52 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.35/15.52 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1666
% 0.35/15.52 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1630
% 0.35/15.52 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 182
% 0.35/15.52 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.35/15.52 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % BW rewrite match attempts : 51
% 0.35/15.52 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.35/15.52 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/15.52 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12826
% 0.35/15.52 % Search garbage collected termcells : 27
% 0.35/15.52
% 0.35/15.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/15.52 % User time : 0.018 s
% 0.35/15.52 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.35/15.52 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.35/15.52 % Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages
% 0.35/15.52
% 0.35/15.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/15.52 % User time : 0.022 s
% 0.35/15.52 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.35/15.52 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.35/15.52 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.35/15.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------