%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GRP012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:03:55 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 04:26:54 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexG. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 8 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 8 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, hypothesis, (product(a,b,c))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (product(X1,identity,X1))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (product(identity,X1,X1))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (product(X1,inverse(X1),identity))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (product(inverse(X1),X1,identity))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, hypothesis, (product(inverse(b),inverse(a),d))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~product(c,d,identity))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (X1=X2|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X4,X1))). % 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X1,X6,X4))). % 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # Found 8 steps % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~product(c,d,identity)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (~product(c,d,identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~product(identity,identity,identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~product(c,inverse(c),identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~product(inverse(c),identity,d)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~product(identity,identity,identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~product(d,identity,d)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~product(d,identity,inverse(c))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_41, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.38 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.38 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.38 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.12/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------